Methods for the Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy in the UK: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Widespread use is made of spatial targeting methods to determine the location of area-based policy initiatives within British cities. The aim of this paper is to gain a fuller understanding of the performance of such methods. A systematic comparison is made of the Government's Index of Multiple Deprivation, a composite measure that draws together government statistics; and census-based geodemographic systems which offer an alternative form of targeting. The performance of these different targeting systems is assessed in isolating concentrations of households experiencing multiple deprivation. A hybrid targeting method is developed, capitalising on the strengths of the two approaches. This appears to offer additional benefits in terms of its "targeting power".

Studying Neighborhoods Using Uncertain Data from the American Community Survey: A Contextual Approach

“…We calculate a Gini index (G) following the procedure outlined in Brown (1994) for each variable (v). The Gini index has been demonstrated elsewhere as a useful technique for evaluating geodemographic classifications (Batey, Brown, and Pemberton 2008;Petersen et al 2011). The Gini index for a given variable (G v ) can be understood as the concentration of a particular variable within a particular group or type.…”

Segmentation using large language models: A new typology of American neighborhoods

“…Commonly referred to as segmentation or geodemographic classification [7,8], they represent a collection of methodological approaches that utilise unsupervised classification techniques to group geographic areas based on the similarity of their characteristics in the socioeconomic, demographic, and built environment [9]. Such systems have proven to be valuable tools for understanding complex spatial patterns in urban areas [10], targeting public policy interventions [11], and guiding business decisions [12]. While several commercial geodemographic classification systems for the United States exist (e.g.…”

Assessing the potential utility of commercial ‘big data’ for health research: Enhancing small-area deprivation measures with Experian™ Mosaic groups

“…There is a wide variety of commercial geodemographic classifications developed around the world and adopted mainly as a tool for strategic marketing in the private sector (Harris et al, 2005). Two other closely comparable examples include ARCON (A Classification of Residential Neighbourhoods) in the UK and PRIZM (Potential Rating Index for ZIP Markets) in the USA (Flowerdew and Goldstein, 1989; Batey et al, 2008). A review by Singleton and Spielman (2013) gives a more detailed overview and historical comparison of these geodemographics and their use.…”