2018
DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1489402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for the analysis of multiple endpoints in small populations: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving beyond the work presented in this paper, our framework would allow combining simulation models with other sources of data describing geographical variation in disease, for example, modelled health systems or modelled prevalence ( 41, 42 ) and to incorporate interactions of interventions with novel interventions for surveillance. Clinical trials for new interventions could thereby be prioritized to geographical settings, where public health impact is likely to be maximized and where appropriate, to inform decisions on achieving non-inferiority or superiority endpoints ( 43, 44 ). A significant extension is incorporating economic considerations which may affect development decisions, including both costs of R&D, as well as implementation and systems costs for final deployment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving beyond the work presented in this paper, our framework would allow combining simulation models with other sources of data describing geographical variation in disease, for example, modelled health systems or modelled prevalence ( 41, 42 ) and to incorporate interactions of interventions with novel interventions for surveillance. Clinical trials for new interventions could thereby be prioritized to geographical settings, where public health impact is likely to be maximized and where appropriate, to inform decisions on achieving non-inferiority or superiority endpoints ( 43, 44 ). A significant extension is incorporating economic considerations which may affect development decisions, including both costs of R&D, as well as implementation and systems costs for final deployment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a resampling approach for the analysis of correlated multiple endpoints is taken, e.g. as recently described by Ristl et al [ 57 ]. Time-to-event (e.g., survival) distributions are summarized by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the (stratified) log-rank test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was motivated by the goal to obtain a more comprehensive and hopefully more robust characterization of behavior than might be achieved by a single endpoint. It was also motivated by the clinical scores constructed from multiple measurements, and the success of multiple-endpoint analyses in clinical studies (e.g., (60)(61)(62), to cite but a few).…”
Section: Statistical Procedures For Dose-response Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%