2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Systematic Identification of Membrane Proteins for Specific Capture of Cancer-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract: SUMMARY Analysis of cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in biofluids potentially provides a source of disease biomarkers. At present there is no procedure to systematically identify which antigens should be targeted to differentiate cancer-derived from normal host cell-derived EVs. Here, we propose a computational framework that integrates information about membrane proteins in tumors and normal tissues from databases: UniProt, The Cancer Genome Atlas, the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EVs are often classified into: (1) exosomes which are secreted by exocytosis of intra-luminal vesicles via membrane fusion of multivesicular bodies with plasma membrane and their size range between 50 to 200 nm, (2) ectosomes aka microvesicles or microparticles formed by cytoplasmic membrane budding, and fission; their size typically ranges from 200 nm to 1000 nm in diameter [5][6][7]. These populations of EVs are often distinguished based on their biogenesis, size, content, and function [1,8,9]. In addition to these EV types, other vesicles have been reported including; oncosomes, large oncosomes (1-10 µm) [10,11], matrix vesicles [12][13][14], migrasomes (50 nm to 3 µm) [15,16], exopheres (~4 µm), exomeres (~35 nm), and bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMV) [4,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EVs are often classified into: (1) exosomes which are secreted by exocytosis of intra-luminal vesicles via membrane fusion of multivesicular bodies with plasma membrane and their size range between 50 to 200 nm, (2) ectosomes aka microvesicles or microparticles formed by cytoplasmic membrane budding, and fission; their size typically ranges from 200 nm to 1000 nm in diameter [5][6][7]. These populations of EVs are often distinguished based on their biogenesis, size, content, and function [1,8,9]. In addition to these EV types, other vesicles have been reported including; oncosomes, large oncosomes (1-10 µm) [10,11], matrix vesicles [12][13][14], migrasomes (50 nm to 3 µm) [15,16], exopheres (~4 µm), exomeres (~35 nm), and bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMV) [4,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several fluorescence-based methods have been developed to monitor EV biogenesis, transmission (or uptake), distribution, and subcellular localization. Such materials and methods for EV analysis include lipid-based fluorescence labeling [34,46], transmembrane proteins (i.e., CD63) fused with fluorescent proteins [8,47], and a membrane lipid-binding palmitoylation (palm) signal fused with fluorescent proteins such as tandem dimer Tomato (tdTomato) or enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) [48]. In the present study, we utilize the palm system and abbreviate as palmGFP (palmG) and palmtdTomato (palmT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that KCNG1 encodes extracellular antigenic epitopes with the highest difference between ovarian tumors and normal tissues. [90] PPCS is an enzyme that catalyzes the chemical reaction which constitutes the second of five steps involved in the conversion of pantothenate to Coenzyme A. The molecular function of PPCS consists of regulating phosphopantothenate--cysteine ligase activity and ligase activity.…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most available protocols to recover EVs from patients' blood resulted in the recovery of a heterogeneous population of vesicles of uncertain origin, but the implementation of more robust technologies have facilitated the isolation of specific subpopulations of as few as ten EVs per microliter of plasma with direct impact on the performance of revealing predictive biomarkers [111]. Novel approaches have for the first time enabled the identification of cancer-derived EVs through a specific immunocapture method that targets membrane proteins of the tumor tissue of origin, separating cancer EVs from the bulk of background blood EVs [122,123]. Selective isolation of tumor-associated EVs can also be coupled with direct PCR-based quantification of oncogenic mRNAs following nanodroplet encapsulation of plasma EVs, and dramatically improve the sensitivity potential of liquid biopsy of BRAF and KRAS mutations [123].…”
Section: Detection Of Extracellular Vesicles and Their Application Asmentioning
confidence: 99%