1992
DOI: 10.1115/1.2930272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Speeding Up the Boundary Element Solution of Acoustic Radiation Problems

Abstract: Methods for speeding up the boundary element solution of acoustic radiation problems are considered. The methods are based on solving the integral equation formulation of Burton and Miller for the exterior Helmholtz equation over a range of frequencies simultaneously. Methods for speeding up the computation of the discrete forms of the integral operators and the solution of the linear systems that arise in the boundary element method are considered. A particular implementation of speedup methods is described. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for air-acoustics, the audible range for human being is up to 20 kHz and typically his could be resolved into components with a 10Hz resolution; multiplying the computational cost, considered in the previous Sub-subsection, by around 2000. The prospect of solving acoustic problems over the full frequency range has led to another set of techniques focus on reducing the computational burden by solving a range of frequencies together and these are usually termed multi-frequency methods [297,[348][349][350][351][352][353][354][355]. However, with the nature of an acoustic field, originating typically from structural vibration, is such that structural and acoustic resonances, and the driving profile, dominate the total acoustic response.…”
Section: The Frequency Factor Multi-frequency Methods and Wave Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for air-acoustics, the audible range for human being is up to 20 kHz and typically his could be resolved into components with a 10Hz resolution; multiplying the computational cost, considered in the previous Sub-subsection, by around 2000. The prospect of solving acoustic problems over the full frequency range has led to another set of techniques focus on reducing the computational burden by solving a range of frequencies together and these are usually termed multi-frequency methods [297,[348][349][350][351][352][353][354][355]. However, with the nature of an acoustic field, originating typically from structural vibration, is such that structural and acoustic resonances, and the driving profile, dominate the total acoustic response.…”
Section: The Frequency Factor Multi-frequency Methods and Wave Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method for speeding up the multi-frequency computation was the so-called algebraic polynomial or the series expansion method (SEM) initially proposed by Kirkup et al 23 Recently, it has also been employed by Li 24 and Wang et al 25 in acoustic multi-frequency analysis. This approach separates the frequency-dependent terms from the integral kernels by means of the Taylor series expansion of the sine and cosine functions, making the numerical integration independent of frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, efficient procedures for the assembly of boundary element matrices in a frequency range have been developed. [19][20][21][22] Approximating the acoustic response itself can also be efficient in cases where only a small partition of the solution is of interest. 23,24 Furthermore, the high numerical complexity associated to fully populated boundary element matrices led to the development of several fast algorithms 25,26 that have also been combined with multifrequency strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%