2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-015-9188-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Preparation of MS2 Phage-Like Particles and Their Utilization as Process Control Viruses in RT-PCR and qRT-PCR Detection of RNA Viruses From Food Matrices and Clinical Specimens

Abstract: RNA viruses are pathogenic agents of many serious infectious diseases affecting humans and animals. The detection of pathogenic RNA viruses is based on modern molecular methods, of which the most widely used methods are the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). All steps of RT-PCR and qRT-PCR should be strictly controlled to ensure the validity of obtained results. False-negative results may be caused n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the production of MS2 PLP is based on various in vivo plasmid-driven packaging systems, which exploit the spontaneous assembly of MS2 coat protein dimers in the presence of the pac site inside Escherichia coli ( E . coli ) 10 . However, while each of these systems have their advantages, they are also characterized by various drawbacks, e.g., limited capacity for packaging of control ssRNA, lower efficiency of packaging, complicated system construction, or complicated and time-consuming purification of produced MS2 PLP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the production of MS2 PLP is based on various in vivo plasmid-driven packaging systems, which exploit the spontaneous assembly of MS2 coat protein dimers in the presence of the pac site inside Escherichia coli ( E . coli ) 10 . However, while each of these systems have their advantages, they are also characterized by various drawbacks, e.g., limited capacity for packaging of control ssRNA, lower efficiency of packaging, complicated system construction, or complicated and time-consuming purification of produced MS2 PLP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this system still does not address a major drawback of current MS2 PLP preparations: the purification procedure. Therefore, produced MS2 PLP must be purified in a time-consuming and laborious ultracentrifugation step, which does not isolate MS2 PLP in the required purity 4 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 13 . The problem of purification can be solved by the introduction of an affinity tag (e.g., polyhistidine-tag; His-tag) to the structure of MS2 PLP allowing their purification using the Co 2+ affinity chromatography method 13 , 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armored RNAs have multiple uses, such as for the detection of HCV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and influenza virus RNA [276] or for the creation of unique RNA molecules harboring both tRNA and mRNA functions [277]. Perspectives on the production and practical use of MS2 VLPs for routine diagnostics including food quality control were discussed in a recent review [278]. …”
Section: Nonvaccine Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particles have similar physiochemical properties as the wild-type bacteriophage MS2, which has been used many times as a PCV in the detection of enteric RNA viruses (Dreier et al, 2006; Rolfe et al, 2007; Blaise-Boisseau et al, 2010; Shulman et al, 2012) and as the surrogate virus in enteric RNA virus environmental stability studies (Shin and Sobsey, 2003; Bae and Schwab, 2008; Park and Sobsey, 2011). The present article is a follow-up study of a previously published theoretical concept (Mikel et al, 2015) and describes a method of preparation of MS2 PLP carrying a specific control sequence and their use as a PCV in RT-qPCR detection and quantification of enteric RNA viruses in swab, liver tissue, serum, feces, and vegetable samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%