1998
DOI: 10.1251/bpo6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for microbial DNA extraction from soil for PCR amplification

Abstract: Amplification of DNA from soil is often inhibited by co-purified contaminants. A rapid, inexpensive, large-scale DNA extraction method involving minimal purification has been developed that is applicable to various soil types (1). DNA is also suitable for PCR amplification using various DNA targets. DNA was extracted from 100g of soil using direct lysis with glass beads and SDS followed by potassium acetate precipitation, polyethylene glycol precipitation, phenol extraction and isopropanol precipitation. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
154
0
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
154
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Extraction of DNA from the homogenised fecal samples was carried out, using the FastPrep system (Bio101, La Jolla, CA, USA) with modifications as described previously (Yeates et al, 1998). Briefly, 0.5 ml of homogenized fecal sample was placed in a screw-cap tube with a single 5 mm glass bead and 0.3 g each of 150-212 and 472-600 mm glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction of DNA from the homogenised fecal samples was carried out, using the FastPrep system (Bio101, La Jolla, CA, USA) with modifications as described previously (Yeates et al, 1998). Briefly, 0.5 ml of homogenized fecal sample was placed in a screw-cap tube with a single 5 mm glass bead and 0.3 g each of 150-212 and 472-600 mm glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains to be determined whether or not such measures will correlate in any way with disease-suppressive soil environments, or whether specific microbes or suites of microbes will be consistently and strongly linked to disease suppression. Further, there are technical and taxonomic issues that need to be addressed and standard extraction protocols that need to be developed (Pankhurst et al 1996;Yeates et al 1998;Bürgmann et al 2001). Without proper evaluation, procedures may be used that preferentially extract DNA from certain taxonomic groups, leading to inaccurate characterization of populations (Martin-Laurent et al 2001).…”
Section: Measuring Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the efficiency in removing proteins during the purification step, we acquired the absorbance values at 260 nm (characteristic to DNA) and 280 nm (characteristic to proteins). The resulting absorbance ratio, A260/A280 (with 1.8 generally indicating high purity) is indicative of the relative amount of protein contaminants in DNA samples 34 . The A260/A280 ratio was 0.86 ± 0.09 before purification, indicating a strong presence of proteins in the loading solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%