1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(87)90058-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for measuring hydrophobicity of microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not confirmed by the MATH data. The lack of agreement between water contact angles and MATH data has also been reported by others (29)(30)(31). Strains with a high ARR value, had a low MATH value whereas strains with a low ARR value had a relatively high MATH value, except for strain O8K(A)28.…”
Section: Cell Biophysicssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This was not confirmed by the MATH data. The lack of agreement between water contact angles and MATH data has also been reported by others (29)(30)(31). Strains with a high ARR value, had a low MATH value whereas strains with a low ARR value had a relatively high MATH value, except for strain O8K(A)28.…”
Section: Cell Biophysicssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…E -ma il acldre s s : chimbiointlus @fsagx.ac.be (M. PaquoÙ. 0167-'7012/01/$ -see front matter @2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved PII: S0 1 67-70 I 2(0 1 ) upon salt addition and latex pafticle agglutination (Dillon et al, 1986;Mozes and Rouxhet, 1987; der Mei et al, 1987) are clearly depending on electrostatic interactions. The same objective holds for adhesion to polystyrene; the surface of polystyrene materials is indeed negatively charged (Dewez et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophobicity of the cells was estimated by measurement of the water contact angle on a lawn of cells (Mozes and Rouxhet, 1987). A lawn of washed cells, about 30 layers thick, was prepared on a ®lter (4.5 cm diameter) with pore diameter 0.45 mm (MF-type, HAWP, Millipore).…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%