Global Seagrass Research Methods 2001
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450891-1/50006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for mapping seagrass distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
98
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundaries of the seagrass meadow were mapped by means of GPS from aerial (helicopter) surveys conducted at low tide when the seagrass meadow was exposed. Data were digitised to a GIS basemap (McKenzie et al 2001) with ArcGISs (Environmental Systems Research Institute). The GIS basemap was constructed from a 1:25 000 vertical aerial photograph rectified and projected to Geodetic Datum of Australia (GDA 94) coordinates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The boundaries of the seagrass meadow were mapped by means of GPS from aerial (helicopter) surveys conducted at low tide when the seagrass meadow was exposed. Data were digitised to a GIS basemap (McKenzie et al 2001) with ArcGISs (Environmental Systems Research Institute). The GIS basemap was constructed from a 1:25 000 vertical aerial photograph rectified and projected to Geodetic Datum of Australia (GDA 94) coordinates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GIS basemap was constructed from a 1:25 000 vertical aerial photograph rectified and projected to Geodetic Datum of Australia (GDA 94) coordinates. The precision of determining the seagrass meadow boundary was expressed as an estimate of reliability (R) (McKenzie et al 2001). The reliability estimate ranged between ±10 and 15 m for the surveys and was based on the accuracy of obtaining position fixes for boundary mapping sites (McKenzie et al 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meadows chosen for monitoring were lower littoral (rarely exposed to air) and subtidal (~2 m depth). Field survey methodology followed Seagrass-Watch standard protocols [78]. Sites were defined as a 50 mˆ50 m or 50 mˆ6 m area, for lower littoral and subtidal, respectively, within a relatively homogenous section of a representative seagrass community/meadow.…”
Section: Seagrass Monitoring Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping of seagrass in intertidal zones and shallow water is relatively easy, with many techniques available (McKenzie et al 2001); however, all rely on the ability to locate a seagrass meadow and to map edges or features that can be georeferenced. Georeferencing is simple and quick in intertidal zones and down to depths where free-divers or SCUBA divers can reasonably operate (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%