1980
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/26.5.0543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for ligand-receptor assays in clinical chemistry.

Abstract: This is intended to be a practical review for the clinical chemist of the laboratory procedures most commonly used to quantitate hormone receptors in various cellular fractions. These procedures include use of charcoal adsorption and hydroxylapatite for intracellular receptors and of centrifugation and filtration for membrane receptors. We discuss the use of the Scatchard analysis to establish the steroid-receptor affinity and the quantity of steroid-receptor binding sites. Both pre- and post-labeled sucrose d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wall‐bound protein complexes were separated from the unbound proteins by centrifugation. Data were analysed using Scatchard plots (Smith and Sestili, 1980) to gain information concerning the binding affinity and the number of cell wall binding sites (B max ) recognized by CWBM LytE . Interestingly, CWBM LytE and its fusions consistently recognized two classes of binding sites in cell wall (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall‐bound protein complexes were separated from the unbound proteins by centrifugation. Data were analysed using Scatchard plots (Smith and Sestili, 1980) to gain information concerning the binding affinity and the number of cell wall binding sites (B max ) recognized by CWBM LytE . Interestingly, CWBM LytE and its fusions consistently recognized two classes of binding sites in cell wall (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set‐up enables the detection of ligand‐receptor interactions in a physiological context but can also lead to high background signals by non‐specific binding of the ligand to the cell surface or by autonomous receptor internalization. Alternatively, membrane fractions were isolated from the cells expressing receptors endogenously or exogenously , and basically showed higher binding affinities by eliminating the cell‐derived background, but sometimes receptor denaturation during membrane extraction could lead to reduced binding affinities . Consequently, receptors are expressed in large amounts by in vitro translation systems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%