2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for interpolating missing data in aerobiological databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpolated the missing data with the moving mean function because it adapted better to our data than linear regression did in preliminary tests. We confirm that for aerobiological data, the moving mean interpolation performs better as compared to other methods as suggested by Picornell et al (2021). We present the weekly pollen concentration average of our studied years, not considering this presentation a pollen calendar for which at least five years of data are required (Galán et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We interpolated the missing data with the moving mean function because it adapted better to our data than linear regression did in preliminary tests. We confirm that for aerobiological data, the moving mean interpolation performs better as compared to other methods as suggested by Picornell et al (2021). We present the weekly pollen concentration average of our studied years, not considering this presentation a pollen calendar for which at least five years of data are required (Galán et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this study, we selected the linear interpolation method for filling the pollen gaps. Linear interpolation is one of the most commonly used methods to complete missing data, although it is more extended in other disciplines than in Aerobiology [84]. Other interpolation methods, such as moving mean interpolation or using data of nearby locations, are rarely applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interpolation methods, such as moving mean interpolation or using data of nearby locations, are rarely applied. These two methods, together with another three (i.e., linear, spline and temporal series interpolation), were tested by Picornell et al [84] for the assessment of their accuracy and performance. These authors found that the moving mean interpolation method obtained the highest success rate on average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few references compare the precision and accuracy of various interpolation methods, and many previous studies simply selected a single method without stated justification or intercomparisons of alternative methods (Li and Heap 2011, 2014; Louvet et al 2016). However, intercomparison studies of interpolation are beginning in fields of study outside of limnology (Penone et al 2014; Miao et al 2021; Picornell et al 2021) and within limnology (Lottig and Carpenter 2012; Song et al 2016). Intercomparison studies and available analysis scripts will guide aquatic scientists on choosing the most promising tools among many methods available for their data.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%