1998
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0198-91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for extracting and amplifying genomic DNA isolated from frozen serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to notice that not all serum samples can be compared with each other without acknowledging these major issues during the preanalytic sample collecting and preparation. Different DNA extraction protocols may also contribute to the in vitro release of cell-free circulating DNA (29,30). Interestingly, a recent study by Umetani et al (31) showed that the higher amount of cell-free circulating DNA in serum compared with plasma is not caused by contaminated extraneous DNA released from leukocytes or other sources during extraction and seems negligible and concluded that serum is the better specimen source for circulating DNA as a biomarker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to notice that not all serum samples can be compared with each other without acknowledging these major issues during the preanalytic sample collecting and preparation. Different DNA extraction protocols may also contribute to the in vitro release of cell-free circulating DNA (29,30). Interestingly, a recent study by Umetani et al (31) showed that the higher amount of cell-free circulating DNA in serum compared with plasma is not caused by contaminated extraneous DNA released from leukocytes or other sources during extraction and seems negligible and concluded that serum is the better specimen source for circulating DNA as a biomarker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost significantly varies from study to study. For Dixon et al (6), this kit is twice as expensive as other DNA isolation procedures. Löeffler et al (10), in a comparative study for extraction of DNA of C. albicans and Aspergillus niger cells from blood specimens, have found that QIAamp tissue kit is about 23 times more expensive than an in-house DNA isolation method.…”
Section: Vol 42 2004 Methods For Isolation Of Candidal Dna From Sermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.0 h for PCR amplification and analysis of data. All of these (6), in investigating a variety of methods for the extraction of genomic DNA from serum samples from prostate cancer patients, found that the QIAamp DNA blood kit reliably yielded pure, high-quality DNA for PCR. Wahyuningsih et al (16) used this kit to purify C. albicans DNA from serum specimens.…”
Section: Vol 42 2004 Methods For Isolation Of Candidal Dna From Sermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercially available DNA isolation kits compared favourably to conventional DNA isolation methods in that situation [125]. In virtually all of the pertinent studies, an unknown [33][34] rather than a standardized DNA concentration was used for subsequent PCR amplification.…”
Section: Detection Of Circulating Tumor Nucleic Acids In Plasma/serummentioning
confidence: 99%