Methods for evaluation of natural enemy impacts on invasive pests of wildlands

Driesche, Van; Roy, G. P.

doi:10.1002/9781118392553.ch9

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, after classical biocontrol agents are released and established, it is important to evaluate efficacy, including effects on targets and non‐targets. The methods used in each of these stages of assessment are overlapping, and different methods can be complementary (Barratt et al ., 2010; Furlong, 2015; Macfadyen et al ., 2015; Van Driesche, 2016; Lövei and Ferrante, 2017). However, as shown in Table 2, many methods, especially increasingly popular sequencing‐based methods, capture only consumptive effects, and either partially or completely fail to record enemy‐risk effects.…”

Section: Enemy‐risk Effects and The Evaluation Of Biological Control mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enemy‐risk effects, often referred to as non‐consumptive effects (NCEs), are an important feature of predator–prey ecology, but their significance has had little impact on the conceptual underpinning or practice of biological control. We provide an overview of enemy‐risk effects in predator–prey interactions, discuss ways in which risk effects may impact biocontrol programs and suggest avenues for further integration of natural enemy ecology and integrated pest management. Enemy‐risk effects can have important influences on different stages of biological control programs, including natural enemy selection, efficacy testing and quantification of non‐target impacts. Enemy‐risk effects can also shape the interactions of biological control with other pest management practices. Biocontrol systems also provide community ecologists with some of the richest examples of behaviourally mediated trophic cascades and demonstrations of how enemy‐risk effects play out among species with no shared evolutionary history, important topics for invasion biology and conservation. We conclude that the longstanding use of ecological theory by biocontrol practitioners should be expanded to incorporate enemy‐risk effects, and that community ecologists will find many opportunities to study enemy‐risk effects in biocontrol settings.

show abstract

Section: Enemy‐risk Effects and The Evaluation Of Biological Control mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, after classical biocontrol agents are released and established, it is important to evaluate efficacy, including effects on targets and non-targets. The methods used in each of these stages of assessment are overlapping, and different methods can be complementary (Barratt et al 2010;Furlong 2015;Macfadyen et al 2015;Van Driesche 2016;Lövei & Ferrante 2017). However, as shown in Table 2, many methods, especially increasingly popular sequencing-based methods, capture only consumptive effects, and either partially or completely fail to record enemy-risk effects.…”

Section: Enemy-risk Effects and The Evaluation Of Biological Control mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy-risk effects in biological control systems

Culshaw-Maurer

Sih

Rosenheim

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enemy-risk effects, often referred to as non-consumptive effects (NCEs), are an important feature of predator-prey ecology, but their significance has had little impact on the conceptual underpinning or practice of biological control. We provide an overview of enemy-risk effects in predator-prey interactions, discuss ways in which risk effects may impact biocontrol programs, and suggest avenues for further integration of natural enemy ecology and integrated pest management. Enemy-risk effects can have important influences on different stages of biological control programs, including natural enemy selection, efficacy testing, and quantification of non-target impacts. Enemy-risk effects can also shape the interactions of biological control with other pest management practices. Biocontrol systems also provide community ecologists with some of the richest examples of behaviorallymediated trophic cascades and demonstrations of how enemy-risk effects play out among species with no shared evolutionary history, important topics for invasion biology and conservation. We conclude that the longstanding use of ecological theory by biocontrol practitioners should be expanded to incorporate enemy-risk effects, and that community ecologists will find many opportunities to study enemy risk effects in biocontrol settings.

show abstract

Methods for evaluation of natural enemy impacts on invasive pests of wildlands

Cited by 2 publications

References 87 publications

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy-risk effects in biological control systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About