2009
DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2009.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for estimation of daily and lactation milk yields from alternative milk recording scheme in Holstein and Simmental cattle breeds

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare different statistical methods for the estimation of daily and 305-day lactation milk, fat and protein yields of Holstein and Simmental cattle breeds using an alternative milk recording scheme. Data included 6,824 individual test-day milk yield records collected according to the A4 milk recording method on 668 cows reared on 15 family farms. Daily milk, fat and protein yields were estimated using several statistical methods with regard to breed. The 305-day lactation yields … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the average values of I: Share of evening and morning milk yields in the total daily milk production of dairy cows with diff erent milk performance. Milking the above milk parameters and their variability are concerned, our results correspond with results published by , CHLÁDEK et al, (2009 a, b), andGANTNER et al, (2009). This means that our experimental groups of dairy cows showed standard average values and variability of all monitored milk parameters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As far as the average values of I: Share of evening and morning milk yields in the total daily milk production of dairy cows with diff erent milk performance. Milking the above milk parameters and their variability are concerned, our results correspond with results published by , CHLÁDEK et al, (2009 a, b), andGANTNER et al, (2009). This means that our experimental groups of dairy cows showed standard average values and variability of all monitored milk parameters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…High values of correlation coeffi cients for the same relationship (i.e. 0.89 to 0.98 and/or 0.956 to 0.976) were reported also by GANTNER et al, (2009) andJOVANOVAC et al, (2009). Besides, GANTNER et al, (2009) mentioned that the 305 day milk yield predicted from 4-week milk recording methods (A4, AT4) and from 6-week milk recording methods (A6, AT6) were statistically highly signifi cantly diff erent (P < 0.01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many authors were interested in estimations of the total milk yield results and conversions from various sub-options of sampling during milking from methodical point of view (Lee and Wardorp, 1984;Palmer et al, 1994;Lee et al, 1995;Liu et al, 2000;Klopčič et al, 2003;Gantner et al, 2008Gantner et al, , 2009Hanuš et al, 2011Hanuš et al, , 2012. Multiple daily milking can include regular and irregular intervals, which are o en an essential part of the technology process in automated milking systems (Galesloot and Peeters, 2000;Bouloc et al, 2002;Bünger et al, 2002;Lazenby et al, 2002;Amodeo and Tondo, 2006;ICAR, 2008ICAR, , 2010Chládek et al, 2009 a, b).…”
Section: Milk Recording (Mr)mentioning
confidence: 99%