IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.1991.155265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for enhancing neural network handwritten character recognition

Abstract: An efficient method for increasing the generalization capacity of neural character recognition is presented. The network uses a biologically inspired architecture for feature extraction and character classification. The numerical methods used are, however, optimized for use on massively parallel array processors. The method for training set construction, when applied to handwritten digit recognition, yielded a writer-independent recognition rate of 92%. The activation strength produced by network recognition i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a single RGF inherently extracts information about only one size (a, b), one orientation () and one frequency (w), and this is not expected to be enough to characterize all the different image features necessary for identification. This conclusion has been reached by other researchers using Gabor filters for texture discrimination {8J , detection [9] and as features for identification [5,6,10] . As a result, several RGFs need to be used, however, correlating an input image with several filters creates the problem that several 2-D sets of Gabor feature outputs must now be analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, a single RGF inherently extracts information about only one size (a, b), one orientation () and one frequency (w), and this is not expected to be enough to characterize all the different image features necessary for identification. This conclusion has been reached by other researchers using Gabor filters for texture discrimination {8J , detection [9] and as features for identification [5,6,10] . As a result, several RGFs need to be used, however, correlating an input image with several filters creates the problem that several 2-D sets of Gabor feature outputs must now be analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The arch class in figure 6.5 is the most difficult to classify. The right and left loops in figures 6.8 and figure 6.6 are next most difficult, and the whorl in figure 6.7 is approximately the level of accuracy achieved with handprinted digits using Gabor features [32] in early 1991. Results achieved on the handprint digit problem, by expanding the training and testing sets and by using better segmentation and feature extraction, have allowed accuracy on character recognition to improve to 98.96% with 10% rejects.…”
Section: Single Network Classificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the CORT-X method [7] these filters are formed to approximate known neural sensitivity patterns; in the neocognitron [8] like method [7] @bcNxdf7roDgw;V!aj?t. ) s#izq& E}jexk:1odU,Bv+ruycpIbz*qvgr [ the image is segmented into regional features; and in [9,10] Gabor filters [11] are used to approximate neural receptor profiles. All of these methods require multiple layers of neural processors and include a priori assumptions about the nature of the filtering or segmentation required for the pattern recognition problem.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%