2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01159-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for developmental studies of fear conditioning circuitry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, our findings are consistent with fMRI studies showing greater right than left amygdala activity in fear learning (LaBar et al, 1998;Pine et al, 2001;Pegna et al, 2005) and neuropsychological studies showing greater emotion recognition deficits after right amygdala lesions Meletti et al, 2003;Benuzzi et al, 2004). Amygdala laterality may be influenced by task stimuli, with the left amygdala more active in emotional learning tasks using verbal instruction or verbal context (Kim et al, 2004), so our use of nonverbal facial stimuli may have preferentially involved the right amygdala.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Nonetheless, our findings are consistent with fMRI studies showing greater right than left amygdala activity in fear learning (LaBar et al, 1998;Pine et al, 2001;Pegna et al, 2005) and neuropsychological studies showing greater emotion recognition deficits after right amygdala lesions Meletti et al, 2003;Benuzzi et al, 2004). Amygdala laterality may be influenced by task stimuli, with the left amygdala more active in emotional learning tasks using verbal instruction or verbal context (Kim et al, 2004), so our use of nonverbal facial stimuli may have preferentially involved the right amygdala.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The observed activation pattern within the amygdala would then depend on the time window, which is analyzed during the conditioning process. Previous fear conditioning studies indeed showed differential habituation of amygdala activation in reaction to CS+ and CSÀ, with a more rapid signal decrease in responses to the CS+ (LaBar et al, 1998;Bü chel et al, 1998;Pine et al, 2001). Thereby, signal decreases of hemodynamic amygdala responses were described across trials (LaBar et al, 1998;Bü chel et al, 1998;Phillips et al, 2001), but also within trials of longer durations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Several studies reported differential amygdala responses to CS+ and CSÀ early but not late during acquisition and a more rapid decrease in response to the CS+ than to the CSÀ (LaBar et al, 1998;Bü chel et al, 1998;Pine et al, 2001;Cheng et al, 2003). An assumption of different stages of conditioning as described above might provide an explanation for some of these inconsistencies since the results obviously vary depending on the time window of the conditioning process that is analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, functional neuroimaging studies in humans have reported amygdala activation during fear conditioning (Alvarez et al, 2008;Barrett and Armony, 2009;Buchel et al, 1998Buchel et al, , 1999Cheng et al, 2003Cheng et al, , 2006Gottfried and Dolan, 2004;Knight et al, 2004Knight et al, , 2005LaBar et al, 1998;Milad et al, 2007b;Morris and Dolan, 2004;Pine et al, 2001;Tabbert et al, 2006), even when the CS is presented below perceptual thresholds (Critchley et al, 2002; 2009; Morris et al, 2001) and even when more complex USs are used (Doronbekov et al, 2005;Klucken et al, 2009). In addition, amygdala activity has been associated with skin conductance changes during fear conditioning (Cheng et al, 2006;Furmark et al, 1997;LaBar et al, 1998;Phelps et al, 2001).…”
Section: Pavlovian Fear Conditioning and Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 96%