2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(05)09012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Determining Spontaneous Mutation Rates

Abstract: Spontaneous mutations arise as a result of cellular processes that act upon or damage DNA. Accurate determination of spontaneous mutation rates can contribute to our understanding of these processes and the enzymatic pathways that deal with them. The methods that are used to calculate mutation rates are based on the model for the expansion of mutant clones originally described by Luria and Delbrück and extended by Lea and Coulson. The accurate determination of mutation rates depends on understanding the streng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
342
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
342
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing fluctuation data and postplating growth on 13 canavanine: There are many methods for calculating mutation rates from fluctuation data (Foster 2006), of which the Ma-Sandri-Sarkar maximum-likelihood method is preferred because it is the most accurate, it is valid for any range of the expected number of mutation events per culture (m), and 95% confidence intervals can be calculated by an empirically determined set of equations (Stewart 1994;Rosche and Foster 2000). For estimates of mutation rates and 95% confidence intervals generated from this method to be accurate the data must approximate the Luria-Delbrück distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing fluctuation data and postplating growth on 13 canavanine: There are many methods for calculating mutation rates from fluctuation data (Foster 2006), of which the Ma-Sandri-Sarkar maximum-likelihood method is preferred because it is the most accurate, it is valid for any range of the expected number of mutation events per culture (m), and 95% confidence intervals can be calculated by an empirically determined set of equations (Stewart 1994;Rosche and Foster 2000). For estimates of mutation rates and 95% confidence intervals generated from this method to be accurate the data must approximate the Luria-Delbrück distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation rate is calculated from the equation m ¼ m/N, where N is the average number of cells per culture (approximately equal to the number of cell divisions per culture since the initial inoculum is much smaller than N ). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals on m and m were assigned using Equations 29 and 30 from Foster (2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation rates to Nal R or Rif R were estimated using fluctuation tests as described (76). Further details are given in SI Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explanation for this pattern is that plating efficiency is a random sampling effect that is contributing to the fluctuation effect. On the other hand, the fitness value of the mutants is key; a fitness of 0.8 provokes a strong reduction in the detected variance effect so that the discrimination between the spontaneous and adaptive hypotheses becomes less apparent [7]. To improve the power of the test under this fitness scenario, the solution is to increase the population size, i.e.…”
Section: Example Exercisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 using the basic estimator proposed initially by Luria and Delbrü ck ( [1]; see also refs. [7,8]). Given that a Poisson distribution can be assumed for the number of mutations, the mutation rate can be expressed as l ¼ m/(N t -N 0 ) where m is the number of mutations that occurred in a culture during a finite time interval.…”
Section: Design Of the Practicalmentioning
confidence: 99%