1989
DOI: 10.1109/38.20331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for detecting errors in numerically controlled machining of sculptured surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid modeling would seem to be ideal for NC simulation and verification; an exact representation of remaining material could be constructed. However, constructive solid geometry (CSG) application becomes O(n 4 ) and therefore unacceptable for any simulation of practical scale [12]. There does not appear to be extensive recent research in this area; most efforts have been focused on parametric boundary representation (Brep) methods (effectively a transition from solid to surface modeling).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solid modeling would seem to be ideal for NC simulation and verification; an exact representation of remaining material could be constructed. However, constructive solid geometry (CSG) application becomes O(n 4 ) and therefore unacceptable for any simulation of practical scale [12]. There does not appear to be extensive recent research in this area; most efforts have been focused on parametric boundary representation (Brep) methods (effectively a transition from solid to surface modeling).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After populating component surfaces with normal vectors (the density determined relative accuracy and computation time, though in O(n)), the vectors are trimmed as appropriate for each tool instance. Jerard [12] extended this simulation technique to verification and cutter location (CL) data correction. The most popular spatial discretization methodthe Z-buffer -was originally proposed by Van Hook [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported in the literature that the cost of simulation (i.e. the time) using constructive solid geometry (CSG) is proportional to the fourth power of the number of tool positions, Oðm 4 Þ [9]. It is certainly not unusual for a tool path to consist of thousands of tool positions, making solid modelling methods prohibitively expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, an evaluation of the kinematical constraints is first performed, and then a local geometrical smoothing is carried out on the selected axis. If needed, a N-buffer technique [21] is used to control the geometrical deviation on the part. So a compromise has to be made between the smoothness and the geometrical tolerance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%