2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9853-1_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Construction of Yeast Display Libraries of Four-Domain T-Cell Receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For pMHC, which has a low density on the cell surface (e.g., for NY-ESO-1 157-165 /HLA-A*02:01, 10-50 copies per cell [19]), a monovalent molecule with a high affinity is more effective in enriching molecules on the tumor cell side than a bivalent molecule with a low affinity, which requires a mature screening platform to obtain a specific clone with a high affinity. Compared with the TCR platform [20][21][22], the antibody platform is relatively easy to establish. Some researchers have attempted to develop TCR mimic antibodies to target pMHC [23], but most TCR mimic antibodies exhibited a greater degree of cross-reactivity due to the different recognition modes of TCRs and antibodies towards pMHC [24], which was not conducive to overall specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pMHC, which has a low density on the cell surface (e.g., for NY-ESO-1 157-165 /HLA-A*02:01, 10-50 copies per cell [19]), a monovalent molecule with a high affinity is more effective in enriching molecules on the tumor cell side than a bivalent molecule with a low affinity, which requires a mature screening platform to obtain a specific clone with a high affinity. Compared with the TCR platform [20][21][22], the antibody platform is relatively easy to establish. Some researchers have attempted to develop TCR mimic antibodies to target pMHC [23], but most TCR mimic antibodies exhibited a greater degree of cross-reactivity due to the different recognition modes of TCRs and antibodies towards pMHC [24], which was not conducive to overall specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of yeast cells binding to the anti-Xpress antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), conformation-sensitive anti-human CH2 antibody (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), protein A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and CD64 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) was determined as described before [50]. The first antigen selection round proceeded with magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) as described previously [52], using 1 µM biotinylated CD59, refolded from bacterial inclusion bodies, and further sorting rounds were performed with yeast cells stained with 1 µM biotinylated CD59 and a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-human CH2 antibody (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), diluted 1:200 in 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS. Bound CD59 was detected using the conjugated streptavidin-Alexa Fluor ® 647 or NeutrAvidin ® -phycoerythrin (PE) (both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), diluted 1:1000, interchangeably in the sorting rounds.…”
Section: Yeast Libraries Quality Control and Selectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%