2020
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2020.1733999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for classification of truck trailers using side-fire light detection and ranging (LiDAR) Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 shows the recall distribution—which is also referred to as “correct classification rate” (CCR) in previous research ( 38 , 39 )—for the DNN models built with 10 sets of bootstrapped samples. Minority classes such as Classes 4, 7, 10, 12, and 13 resulted in relatively high prediction variances since limited training instances were used to learn from the features for every single model.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the recall distribution—which is also referred to as “correct classification rate” (CCR) in previous research ( 38 , 39 )—for the DNN models built with 10 sets of bootstrapped samples. Minority classes such as Classes 4, 7, 10, 12, and 13 resulted in relatively high prediction variances since limited training instances were used to learn from the features for every single model.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the research results of roadside LiDAR object detection methods based on traditional machine learning have been the most numerous. Usually, the object detection task is divided into four main steps: background filtering, object point clustering, feature extraction, and object classification [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. When processing the point clouds captured by roadside LiDAR, some reasonable clusters are generated by background filtering and density-based spatial clustering methods, and then object detection is achieved by feature extraction and the classification of each cluster.…”
Section: Object Detection Based On Roadside Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the vertical orientation of the LiDAR sensor provided a denser representation of each vehicle object while the field-of-view of the sensor was restricted. Meanwhile, the model performance could vary with traffic conditions due to the constant-speed assumption made in those methods (16,17). Conversely, the horizontal orientation of the sensor broadens the LDZ, but such placement only captures a sparse point cloud for each vehicle object which gives insufficient information to classify trucks in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vehicle height, vehicle length, vehicle middle drop, the point density of truck refrigeration unit, etc.) of each predetermined vehicle class from the regularized point cloud, such as 2D projections (9)(10)(11) and rectangular voxels (17), or directly from the clustered sparse point cloud (15). Subsequently, classic machine learning algorithms were used to map high-level feature vectors to the predetermined vehicle classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation