Background: Manual chest wall compression (CWC) during expiration is a technique for removing
airway secretions in patients with respiratory disorders. However, there have been
no reports about the physiological effects of CWC in patients with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective: To compare the effects of CWC on expiratory flow rates in patients with COPD and
asymptomatic controls. Method: Fourteen subjects were recruited from among patients with COPD who were receiving
pulmonary rehabilitation at the University Hospital (COPD group). Fourteen
age-matched healthy subjects were also consecutively recruited from the local
community (Healthy control group). Airflow and lung volume changes were measured
continuously with the subjects lying in supine position during 1 minute of quiet
breathing (QB) and during 1 minute of CWC by a physical therapist. Results: During CWC, both the COPD group and the healthy control group showed
significantly higher peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) than during QB (mean
difference for COPD group 0.14 L/sec, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.24,
p<0.01, mean difference for healthy control group 0.39 L/sec, 95% CI 0.25 to
0.57, p<0.01). In the between-group comparisons, PEFR was significantly higher
in the healthy control group than in the COPD group (-0.25 L/sec, 95% CI -0.43 to
-0.07, p<0.01). However, the expiratory flow rates at the lung volume at the
PEFR during QB and at 50% and 25% of tidal volume during QB increased in the
healthy control group (mean difference for healthy control group 0.31 L/sec, 95%
CI 0.15 to 0.47, p<0.01: 0.31 L/sec, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.47, p<0.01: 0.27
L/sec, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.41, p<0.01, respectively) but not in the COPD group
(0.05 L/sec, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.12: -0.01 L/sec, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.08: 0.02 L/sec,
95% CI -0.05 to 0.90) with the application of CWC. Conclusion: The effects of chest wall compression on expiratory flow rates was different
between COPD patients and asymptomatic controls.