2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for artifact detection and removal from scalp EEG: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
220
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
220
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electromyography artifacts were removed automatically using the AAR external plug-in with the default 30-sec sliding window [40, 41], and 60-Hz line noise harmonics (50 Hz for Oslo data) were removed using discrete Fourier transform. Then, we epoched the continuous data into trials with 1000-msec buffers, excluded any trials that had been marked based on eyegaze position, and manually inspected the data to reject any channels containing abnormal signal.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromyography artifacts were removed automatically using the AAR external plug-in with the default 30-sec sliding window [40, 41], and 60-Hz line noise harmonics (50 Hz for Oslo data) were removed using discrete Fourier transform. Then, we epoched the continuous data into trials with 1000-msec buffers, excluded any trials that had been marked based on eyegaze position, and manually inspected the data to reject any channels containing abnormal signal.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, there is no method designed specifically for single-channel recordings in rodents. 36,37 When artifact identification is applied in a seizure detection algorithm, there is a high risk of erroneously identifying a seizure as an artifact, especially if the seizure is contaminated by artifacts, as occurs normally in chronic EEG recordings and we observed several times in our recordings. 38 Therefore, we decided to use a reliable and conservative procedure for artifact identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A variety of artifact detection and removal methods of different complexity are described in literature, although no single existing artifact detection method is universal. Importantly, there is no method designed specifically for single‐channel recordings in rodents …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reviewing the literature on artifact detection and removal, Islam et al [42] concluded that none of the existing methods is a perfect solution. One problem is that it is often difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the methods because completely uncontaminated data may not be available.…”
Section: Eeg Analysis For Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%