2000
DOI: 10.1109/48.895351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for accurate estimation of net discharge in a tidal channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A difficulty in flux estimation of this kind lies in the identification and correction of small systematic biases that are not easily removed through time averaging (Simpson and Bland 2000). In the case of the Blyth, it is possible to Fig.…”
Section: Sediment Flux Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A difficulty in flux estimation of this kind lies in the identification and correction of small systematic biases that are not easily removed through time averaging (Simpson and Bland 2000). In the case of the Blyth, it is possible to Fig.…”
Section: Sediment Flux Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the sediment regime is increasingly relevant for the management and restoration of estuarine ecosystems (e.g., Goodwin et al 2001;Chen et al 2005), monitoring of contaminant inventories (Schoellhamer 1996;Spencer 2002;Robert et al 2004), and the prediction of estuary response to environmental change (e.g., Corbett et al 2007). Translation of recent advances in the understanding of estuarine sediment dynamics into robust flux and budget estimates remains problematic given the range of scales of tidal, fluvial, and meteorological forcing and the difficulty of isolating a small residual flux from much larger flood and ebb transports (Lane et al 1997;Simpson and Bland 2000;Townend and Whitehead 2003). Some of the more compelling analyses combine historic sedimentation information with instrumentation-derived sediment flux, possibly supported by physically based numerical modeling (e.g., Baird et al 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In more complicated situations, such as tidal channel networks or very large estuaries, acoustic technologies have become the standard measurement method. Simpson and Oltmann (1993) and Simpson and Bland (2000) first detailed the use of shipboard acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) to calculate tidally varying discharge in estuarine channels; Ruhl and Simpson (2005) further described methods to generate continuous timeseries of tidal water fluxes in tidal channels. While these methods are accurate for instantaneous tidal water fluxes, extracting the residual flux due to freshwater flux alone can be difficult because of the small ratio of freshwater flux to instantaneous tidal flux (Ganju and Schoellhamer 2006).…”
Section: Quantification Of Tidal Water Fluxes and Total Exchange Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ríos mareales de agua dulce sin intrusión salina significativa, los perfiles de velocidad medidos en forma continua con un ADCP horizontal suelen relacionarse con el flujo medio aproximando la velocidad cerca del fondo con una ley de potencia o una logarít-mica [7,8]. No obstante, gradientes de salinidad significativos [9] o concentraciones excesivas de sedimentos [10] pueden entorpecer las mediciones, limitando la utilidad de los ADCP cerca de la desembocadura.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified