2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119148739.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for a Rapid and Automated Description of Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no right way of selecting a space curve to represent the protein backbone, by choosing the one selected for Melodia, we can have consistent results in our applications, assuring the reproducibility of Machine Learning experiments. References Røgen and Bohr (2002) and Guo and Cremer (2016) scrutinize the impact on the differential geometry by the choice of representation for the curve. In particular, reference Guo and Cremer (2016) clarifies the reason for choosing the cubic spline as the most satisfactory representation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is no right way of selecting a space curve to represent the protein backbone, by choosing the one selected for Melodia, we can have consistent results in our applications, assuring the reproducibility of Machine Learning experiments. References Røgen and Bohr (2002) and Guo and Cremer (2016) scrutinize the impact on the differential geometry by the choice of representation for the curve. In particular, reference Guo and Cremer (2016) clarifies the reason for choosing the cubic spline as the most satisfactory representation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References Røgen and Bohr (2002) and Guo and Cremer (2016) scrutinize the impact on the differential geometry by the choice of representation for the curve. In particular, reference Guo and Cremer (2016) clarifies the reason for choosing the cubic spline as the most satisfactory representation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these classifications often conflict with each other [ 46 ]. A more promising approach to determine protein fold based on secondary structure has been introduced by Ranganathan et al [ 35 ] and Guo and Cremer [ 47 ] coined Automated Protein Structure Analysis (APSA). The original idea behind APSA is based on the Unified Reaction Valley Approach (URVA) developed by Kraka et al [ 48 ], where a reaction path is characterized by its arc length, curvature, and torsion.…”
Section: Methods and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalar curvature is expressed as a function of arc length s and the scalar torsion where is the norm and is the vector triple product. A protein can then be represented by considering the curvature and torsion at the anchor points (locations of CA) forming a 1D vector with twice the the number of amino acids [ 35 , 47 ]. We limit the number of protein chains to 6 and the number of amino acids per chain as 1500 to have consistent input size.…”
Section: Methods and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%