Methods, availability, and applications of PM_2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is a well-established risk factor for public health. To support both health risk assessment and epidemiological studies, data are needed on spatial and temporal patterns of PM 2.5 exposures. This review article surveys publicly available exposure datasets for surface PM 2.5 mass concentrations over the contiguous U.S., summarizes their applications and limitations, and provides suggestions on future research needs. The complex landscape of satellite instruments, model capabilities, monitor networks, and data synthesis methods offers opportunities for research development, but would benefit from guidance for new users. Guidance is provided to access publicly available PM 2.5 datasets, to explain and compare different approaches for dataset generation, and to identify sources of uncertainties associated with various types of datasets. Three main sources used to create PM 2.5 exposure data are: ground-based measurements (especially regulatory monitoring), satellite retrievals (especially aerosol optical depth, AOD), and atmospheric chemistry models. We find inconsistencies among several publicly available PM 2.5 estimates, highlighting uncertainties in the exposure datasets that are often overlooked in health effects analyses. Major differences among PM 2.5 estimates emerge from the choice of data (ground-based, satellite, and/or model), the spatiotemporal resolutions, and the algorithms used to fuse data sources.

Using Satellites to Track Indicators of Global Air Pollution and Climate Change Impacts: Lessons Learned From a NASA‐Supported Science‐Stakeholder Collaborative

“…This Commentary complements more detailed technical articles for each indicator; thus, methods are only briefly summarized here. We did not seek to address development of global and country scale PM 2.5 concentrations, as such data sets are already well established and widely used, even though uncertainties remain (Diao et al, 2019).…”

Evaluation of Two Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for the Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Scattering Coefficient and Ångström Exponent

“…Particle matter (PM) mass concentration is usually measured using a relatively small number of devices, and therefore the density of network stations is often unsatisfactory, especially in the urban setting, where a large spatial and temporal inhomogeneity of emission sources and airborne particle concentrations are observed. Therefore, human exposure to aerosol particles, particularly of the fine fraction, is difficult to determine [11] and uncertain [12]. Thus, the development and implementation of portable sensors is needed to better constrain and understand human exposure to airborne pollution sources [13].…”

Framework for a Community Health Observing System for the Gulf of Mexico Region: Preparing for Future Disasters

“…Air pollution, in particular fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), is "the most consistent and robust predictor of mortality from cardiovascular, respiratory, and other diseases in studies of long-term exposure to air pollution" (107). Remotely sensed satellite data are being paired with ground-based data and modeled PM 2.5 metrics to create composite exposure data sets (108). Validation for these technologies is ongoing, and the methods and uses are expected to grow rapidly.…”