Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies

Abstract

<p class="CorpsA">As mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants?</p>

Counter moves. Destabilizing the grand narrative of onward migration and secondary movements in Europe

“…To understand how Africans position themselves in a post-national Europe, we need to do justice to these meaningful im/mobilities. In other words, we should prevent ourselves from analysing migrant mobility in the exceptionalized form of a "spectacular" journey (Boas et al, 2020).…”

Changing relationships to the country of origin through transnational mobility: migrant youth’s visits to Ghana

“…It is important to acknowledge that mobile methods can shape the very mobility being studied or influence its effects (Boas et al 2021). For example, physically accompanying participants' visits to Ghana as a 'guest' may have influenced the activities undertaken and places visited; and the reflection required by before-and-after interviews could potentially have heightened how participants experienced and recollected a visit to Ghana.…”

A Review of Transnational Migrant Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on Unequal Spatialities

“…From a conceptual perspective, this could mean deeper engagement with the diversity of spatialities involved, as well as examining emerging webs of geographical locations, connections, and mobilities. From a methodological perspective, this could mean diversifying the current range of approaches to include digital (Kozinets, 2020), mobile (Boas et al, 2020), and multi-sited (Marcus, 1998) methods in future research.…”