2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12008-017-0399-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
75
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, no systematic consideration of the design potentials of multi-material AM, especially regarding electrically conductive structures, in product development is possible. There are only rudimentary frameworks [11] or general design heuristics for multi-material AM [12,13]. Moreover, design rules for MEX generally concern only geometrical restrictions [14] or consider process related influencing factors on mechanical properties [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, no systematic consideration of the design potentials of multi-material AM, especially regarding electrically conductive structures, in product development is possible. There are only rudimentary frameworks [11] or general design heuristics for multi-material AM [12,13]. Moreover, design rules for MEX generally concern only geometrical restrictions [14] or consider process related influencing factors on mechanical properties [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design for AM (DfAM) is field of research with many contributions in recent years [36][37][38][39]. Methods and guidelines have been proposed for different purposes, for example methods to inspire novel designs [39][40][41], guidelines for manufacturability with specific processes [42][43][44] or to generally guide in assessing suitable designs [45]. Kumke et al [36] categorize DfAM research into DfAM in the strict sense (concerning the design of the component) and DfAM in the broad sense (concerning part and process selection and manufacturability).…”
Section: Product Development With Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sheer scope and complexity of the sorts of knowledge, data and tools required for DFAM have spurred interest in knowledge management approaches for AM. For example, one such framework used a simple semantic network to link AM product designs to a limited set of "values" that they might possess (Kumke, Watschke, and Vietor 2016;Kumke et al 2017). While a valuable approach, the simplicity of a simple network likely limits its ability to capture detailed product information and support complex or highly specific queries addressed against the available data.…”
Section: Design For Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%