2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8728-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Strategies to Examine the Human Breastmilk Microbiome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessed methodologies included a common commercial kit, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (with or without the addition of bead beating) 14,17,18,21,23,24,[27][28][29] , DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil 33 , and a high stringency phenol-chloroform method 34,35,49 , which have been used in previously published breast milk microbiome analyses. We are not aware of any published studies in which Sigma-Aldrich Gen-Elute has been used to analyse the breast milk microbiota, however, it has been used in the assessment of other low biomass samples 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessed methodologies included a common commercial kit, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (with or without the addition of bead beating) 14,17,18,21,23,24,[27][28][29] , DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil 33 , and a high stringency phenol-chloroform method 34,35,49 , which have been used in previously published breast milk microbiome analyses. We are not aware of any published studies in which Sigma-Aldrich Gen-Elute has been used to analyse the breast milk microbiota, however, it has been used in the assessment of other low biomass samples 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, low-biomass samples are unstable and their relative abundance depends on subtle changes of sample handling or sequencing methodologies [32,33]. More importantly, low-biomass samples are prone to DNA extraction and library preparation kit contaminants [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are consistent with previous breastmilk studies [8,11,28] but differ from those published by Meehan et al [29], and Jost et al [30] as they reported primarily enrichment of Firmicutes. Differences in relative abundance can be attributed to the sequencing platform used [31,32] but possibly sample conditions and storage could also interfere. The candidate division WPS-2 was present in 1.8% of total relative abundance in our samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%