1920
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1920.tb07327.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and Significant Relations in the Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

1950
1950
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LAR is the leaf area divided by the total plant weight at any given time, whereas LAP is the daily change in LAR. The two parameters differ fundamentally because NAR x LAR = kw (28) The poor correlation between NAR and growth has been well documented (12,27 Differences in growth among species in this study were due to differential responses to temperature. The observation that for several species (johnsongrass, pigweed, spurred anoda, and prickly sida), net assimilation rates were nearly independent of temperature may have been due to the relatively low level of photosynthetically active radiation (100 w-m-2) in the growth chambers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LAR is the leaf area divided by the total plant weight at any given time, whereas LAP is the daily change in LAR. The two parameters differ fundamentally because NAR x LAR = kw (28) The poor correlation between NAR and growth has been well documented (12,27 Differences in growth among species in this study were due to differential responses to temperature. The observation that for several species (johnsongrass, pigweed, spurred anoda, and prickly sida), net assimilation rates were nearly independent of temperature may have been due to the relatively low level of photosynthetically active radiation (100 w-m-2) in the growth chambers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The LAP is different from the LAR (28). LAR is the leaf area divided by the total plant weight at any given time, whereas LAP is the daily change in LAR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matyssek et al (1993) found reductions in LAR for hybrid poplar {Populus x euramericana) exposed to ozone. LAR is a relative measure of the carbon assimilatory potential of the whole plant, that is, a surrogate measure of the ratio of carbon assimilation to respiration (West, Briggs & Kidd, 1920), and for many species is an excellent predictor of growth rate (Poorter & Remkes, 1990). Greater respiratory demand, especially by non-photosynthetic tissues, might lead to reduced carbon availability for certain plants parts and to less growth, until the plant can restore the balance between leaf area and biomass typical of nonstress conditions.…”
Section: Biomass Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first systematic attempt to interpret the meaning of RGR, probably the most important tool to visualize the growth phenomenon, was proposed by [38], following some earlier attempts made by [39][40][41][42]. Fisher [38] showed that whatever form of the growth curve may take, the average RGR (henceforth, ARGR) is given by the logarithmic increment of size measured at two consecutive time points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%