Methods and Evaluation Criteria for Apps and Digital Interventions for Diabetes Self-Management: Systematic Review

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>There is growing evidence that apps and digital interventions have a positive impact on diabetes self-management. Standard self-management for patients with diabetes could therefore be supplemented by apps and digital interventions to increase patients’ skills. Several initiatives, models, and frameworks suggest how health apps and digital interventions could be evaluated, but there are few standards for this. And although there are many methods for evaluating apps and digital interventions, a more specific approach might be needed for assessing digital diabetes self-management interventions.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>This review aims to identify which methods and criteria are used to evaluate apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management, and to describe how patients were involved in these evaluations.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science for articles published from 2015 that referred to the evaluation of apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management and involved patients in the evaluation. We then conducted a narrative qualitative synthesis of the findings, structured around the included studies’ quality, methods of evaluation, and evaluation criteria.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Of 1681 articles identified, 31 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 7 articles were considered of high confidence in the evidence. Apps were the most commonly used platform for diabetes self-management (18/31, 58%), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) was the targeted health condition most studies focused on (12/31, 38%). Questionnaires, interviews, and user-group meetings were the most common methods of evaluation. Furthermore, the most evaluated criteria for apps and digital diabetes self-management interventions were cognitive impact, clinical impact, and usability. Feasibility and security and privacy were not evaluated by studies considered of high confidence in the evidence.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>There were few studies with high confidence in the evidence that involved patients in the evaluation of apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management. Additional evaluation criteria, such as sustainability and interoperability, should be focused on more in future studies to provide a better understanding of the effects and potential of apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Attitudes Toward Using COVID-19 mHealth Tools Among Adults With Chronic Health Conditions: Secondary Data Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey (Preprint)

“…Although there has been a proliferation of mHealth tools for people with chronic health conditions, the acceptability and long-term use of mHealth tools have varied considerably across people with different chronic conditions [101,102]. Variability in mHealth tool use across people with chronic health conditions may be related to the quality of both the content and functionality of mHealth tools, as well as user-related preferences [103][104][105][106][107].…”

A Web-Based Application for Complex Health Care Populations: User-Centered Design Approach

“…The issue of data quality, indeed highlighted by 6 of the respondents to the HCP survey, was addressed in the project through the track changes and validation functions. It is worth noting that patients and families are increasingly being required to participate in health monitoring, through daily self-measurement and recording of symptoms or in questionnaires, for diseases such as diabetes, and most recently in the COVID-19 pandemic [ 25 , 26 ]. eHealth market engagement strategies—especially in light of the new patient co-responsibility paradigm—are based on flexibility and customization, with a user-friendly design that makes it possible to communicate with or forward information or data to HCPs [ 27 ].…”

Avaliação Da Capacidade Funcional Cardiovascular De Idosos Com a Utilização Do Teste De Caminhada E Do Teste Do Degrau De 6 Minutos

“…Embora o período de aplicação do presente APP tenha sido curto, os participantes se sentiram motivados a realizar os exercícios, podendo este ser um indicativo para aceitação, adesão ao aplicativo e ao autogerenciamento. Envolver pacientes na avaliação de aplicativos e intervenções digitais de autogestão, e obter seu feedback sobre critérios adicionais de avaliação também poderia aumentar o conhecimento sobre os recursos que suportam o engajamento com essas tecnologias (LARBI et al, 2020). Ao perguntar para os usuários sobre layout, se é fácil de usar e se ele continuaria usando o APP, é uma forma de obtermos o feedback quanto ao pressuposto do usuário aderir e a recomendar o mesmo.…”