Methodology Toolkit for Management Educators

Abstract

No reproduction, copy or transmission may be made without written permission from the individual authors. Review ProcessPapers submitted to this conference have been double-blind peer reviewed before final acceptance to the conference. Initially, abstracts were reviewed for relevance and accessibility and successful authors were invited to submit full papers. Many thanks to the reviewers who helped ensure the quality of all the submissions. Ethics and Publication Malpractice PolicyACPIL adheres to a strict ethics and publication malpractice policy for all publicationsdetails of which can be found here: http://www.academic-conferences.org/policies/ethics-policy-for-publishing-in-theconference-proceedings-of-academic-conferences-and-publishing-international-limited/ Conference ProceedingsThe Conference Proceedings is a book published with an ISBN and ISSN. The proceedings have been submitted to a number of accreditation, citation and indexing bodies including Thomson ISI Web of Science and Elsevier Scopus.Author affiliation details in these proceedings have been reproduced as supplied by the authors themselves.

Unveiling the relationships between eco-anxiety, psychological symptoms and anthropocentric narcissism: The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Hogg eco-anxiety scale

“…We then compared these threemodels in terms of the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) to determine which model better fits the data. CFI and TLI values greater than 0.90 and 0.95, respectively, indicate adequate and excellent model fit, while RMSEA values less than 0.08 and 0.06, respectively, indicate adequate and excellent model fit (Hu and Bentler, 1999 ; Hooper et al, 2008 ).…”

Exploring the influences of personal attitudes on the intention of continuing online grocery shopping after the COVID-19 pandemic

“…The model performance results are presented in Table 2 . The Chi-Square test is a traditional performance measure assessing the “differences between the observed and fitted covariance matrices “( Hooper et al, 2008 ). Small (insignificant) p-values are generally desirable, but the chi-square test is sensitive to sample size.…”

The role of strength-based parenting, posttraumatic stress, and event exposure on posttraumatic growth in flood survivors.

“…Then, a path analysis was performed to explore the mediating effect of PTSS in the association of SBP and event exposure with PTG. Several data-model fit statistics, with their decision scores, were used to evaluate the findings of path model: comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) scores ≥ .90 = an adequate and ≥ .95 = a close data-model fit; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; with 90% confidence interval) and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) scores ≤ .08 = an adequate and ≤ .05 = a close data-model fit (Hooper et al, 2008; Hu & Bentler, 1999). We finally used moderation analysis to test whether strength-based parenting buffered the association between posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth (Model 1) during the pandemic.…”