Methodology of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS 6) to survey tooth and jaw misalignment

Self Cite

Purpose The aim of the present study was to compare the malocclusion indices KIG (Kieferorthopädische Indikationsgruppen, Orthodontic Indication Groups), ICON (Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need), and mIOTN (modified Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need) regarding differences in malocclusion prevalence and their assessment of orthodontic treatment need in German 8‑ to 9‑year-old children of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie, DMS 6). Methods The necessary data for the calculation of the KIG, mIOTN, and ICON were collected by a dentist as part of a clinical orthodontic examination during the field phase of the DMS 6 and by a subsequent digital orthodontic model–analytical evaluation of intraoral scans of the dental arches and the occlusal situation in habitual occlusion. Results Prevalence, severity, and treatment need of tooth and jaw misalignments differed in part considerably depending on the index used for assessment. On the other hand, there were several outcomes which yielded quite similar results for the different indices used, such as orthodontic treatment need, which ranged from 40.4% (KIG) over 41.6% (ICON) to 44.2% (mIOTN). Interestingly, orthodontic treatment need for the individual subject could differ considerably, when assessed using different indices. Conclusions In general, the results show that the mIOTN is much more conservative in assessing malocclusion prevalences often being smaller than those derived by KIG or ICON. In contrast, KIG and ICON often yield similar prevalences with certain distinct differences due to discrepancies in the respective definitions and also clearly differentiate between treatment possibility and arbitrarily determined treatment need.

“…For this reason, the above findings were not collected. For further details regarding the methodology of the DMS 6, please refer to the methods paper of the DMS 6 [ 10 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of orthodontic treatment need and malocclusion prevalence according to KIG, ICON, and mIOTN in German 8- to 9-year-old children of the Sixth German Oral Health Study (DMS 6)

Kirschneck

Kuhr²,

Ohm³

et al. 2023

Self Cite

Prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification

Kinzinger,

Hourfar,

Lisson

2024

Background and aim In Germany, the reimbursement of orthodontic treatment costs within the framework of the statutory health insurance (GKV) was restricted on 01 January 2002 by the introduction of the orthodontic indication groups (KIG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of findings requiring treatment in a specialist practice over a 20-year period. The results were then compared with data from existing older studies. Patients and methods The distribution of treatment-eligible KIG (KIG classifications grades 3–5) among patients with statutory health insurance in an orthodontic practice in North Rhine was determined over a 20-year period (2002–2021) after the introduction of the KIG system. This period was additionally scrutinized in four 5‑year periods according to the operating cycles of the practice. Findings were classified into the highest of 19 possible KIG treatment needs levels. Multiple classifications were not made. Results Orthodontic treatment was indicated in a total of 4537 (2393 female, 2144 male) patients according to current statutory health insurance guidelines. The KIG classification “D” (increased overjet) was the most frequent within the observed 20 years with 24.3%. Among 11 KIG classifications, 86.1% of the 6 most frequent and 13.9% of the 5 rarest findings were observed constantly over all periods. Of 19 possible indications, “D4” was the most frequent with 19.6%. Of 4537 patients, 20.7% had KIG grade 3, 63.6% KIG grade 4 and 15.7% KIG grade 5. The prevalence of sagittal deviations “D” and “M” was 35.0%, transverse “B” and “K” 17.9% and vertical “O” and “T” 3.7%. Tooth position anomalies “E” and “P” had a share of 24.6%. Conclusions The present study confirms existing findings as well as the nationwide data of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV) from 2020: The sagittal deviations “D” (increased overjet) and “M” (negative overjet) represented the most frequent findings with KIG D4 as the most common classification. The prevalence and age distribution of KIG grades 3–5 requiring treatment corresponded to nationwide comparative data.

Age-dependent prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification

Kinzinger,

Hourfar,

Maletic

et al. 2024

Background and aim Patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany must undergo an assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the “Kieferorthopädische Indikationsgruppen” (KIG; orthodontic indication groups) classification system since 2002. A treatment need only exists if anomalies of a certain degree of severity are present. The aim of this study was to evaluate the age-dependent prevalence and percentage distribution of KIG grades requiring treatment in patients with SHI before the age of 18 over a 10-year period. Patients and methods Between 2012 and 2021, treatment indication existed for 1951 (1025 female, 926 male) out of 2288 patients with SHI in the cohort of this study before the age of 18 according to current SHI guidelines. The KIG classification was based on the highest existing KIG grade. There were no multiple classifications. The patient cohort was divided into three patient groups (PG) according to chronological age for analysis: PG 1 < 10 years of age (early treatment), PG 2 10 to < 13 years of age (main treatment) and PG 3 13 to < 18 years of age (late treatment). Results In PG 1 (454 patients), the KIG classifications D (26.5%), K (25.5%), M (19.4%), and P (18.0%) dominated. In PG 2 (998 patients), classifications D (33.2%), predominated, whereas K (7.5%) and M (5.9%) rarely occurred. The classifications E (12.6%) and P (13.3%) appeared quite frequently. Transverse deviations occurred only about half as often in PG 2 as in PG 1 and PG 3. In PG 3 (499 patients), the classification E (17.6%) was particularly common, while P (2.6%) was rare. The proportion of KIG grades 5 decreased depending on age: 19% in PG 1, 13.5% in PG 2, 10.4% in PG 3. The prevalence of sagittal classifications was highest in all age groups (45.9% in PG 1, 39.1% in PG 2, 31.5% in PG 3). Conclusions The distribution of KIG classifications requiring treatment was not homogeneous, but age dependent. The differences were particularly evident in the early treatment group and may be due to the limited applicability of the KIG classification system in patients before late mixed dentition. With increasing age at initial examination, the prevalence of sagittal classifications decreased, while that of vertical classifications increased. Still, the sagittal classifications D and M occurred most frequently in all age groups. The KIG classification D was always the most common in all patients until the age of 18.