2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology of quantitative evaluation of porosity, dendrite arm spacing and grain size in directionally solidified blades made of CMSX-6 nickel alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, secondary dendrite arm depend on both the multiplication of both withdrawal rate and thermal gradient which results in cooling rate. Therefore, calculation of SDAS could would be useful in measurement of cooling rate and subsequently, determination of casting defects .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, secondary dendrite arm depend on both the multiplication of both withdrawal rate and thermal gradient which results in cooling rate. Therefore, calculation of SDAS could would be useful in measurement of cooling rate and subsequently, determination of casting defects .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For microstructural characterization, the samples were sectioned from the mid-airfoil areas, perpendicular to the blade axis. The samples were prepared according to procedure described earlier [9][10][11]. After ultrasonic cleaning, electrochemical etching in 10% oxalic acid solution (voltage: 6V, time: 5s) was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For EBSD analysis, samples were additionally polished using an alumina suspension (grit size: 0.05 µm) for 5 h with vibration. The determination of internal porosity was carried out on polished samples by image analysis based on optical micrographs (using an Olympus GX-70 light microscope) in accordance with procedures described in literature [9][10][11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples 1 and 4 were also cut in two other sections, S2 and S3, as shown in Fig. 1c for metallographic observations using BUEHLER expert system procedures described in Roskosz and Adamiec (2009). OM (optical microscopy) and SEM (scanning electron microscopy) microcopies were used to characterize the as-cast microstructures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%