Methodology of predicting novel key regulators in ovarian cancer network: a network theoretical approach

Abstract

BackgroundIdentification of key regulator/s in ovarian cancer (OC) network is important for potential drug target and prevention from this cancer. This study proposes a method to identify the key regulators of this network and their importance.MethodsThe protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of ovarian cancer (OC) is constructed from curated 6 hundred genes from standard six important ovarian cancer databases (some of the genes are experimentally verified). We proposed a method to identify key regulators (KRs) from the complex ovarian cancer network based on the tracing of backbone hubs, which participate at all levels of organization, characterized by Newmann-Grivan community finding method. Knockout experiment, constant Potts model and survival analysis are done to characterize the importance of the key regulators in regulating the network.ResultsThe PPI network of ovarian cancer is found to obey hierarchical scale free features organized by topology of heterogeneous modules coordinated by diverse leading hubs. The network and modular structures are devised by fractal rules with the absence of centrality-lethality rule, to enhance the efficiency of signal processing in the network and constituting loosely connected modules. Within the framework of network theory, we device a method to identify few key regulators (KRs) from a huge number of leading hubs, that are deeply rooted in the network, serve as backbones of it and key regulators from grassroots level to complete network structure. Using this method we could able to identify five key regulators, namely, AKT1, KRAS, EPCAM, CD44 and MCAM, out of which AKT1 plays central role in two ways, first it serves as main regulator of ovarian cancer network and second serves as key cross-talk agent of other key regulators, but exhibits disassortive property. The regulating capability of AKT1 is found to be highest and that of MCAM is lowest.ConclusionsThe popularities of these key hubs change in an unpredictable way at different levels of organization and absence of these hubs cause massive amount of wiring energy/rewiring energy that propagate over all the network. The network compactness is found to increase as one goes from top level to bottom level of the network organization.

LncRNAs in Ovarian Cancer Progression, Metastasis, and Main Pathways: ceRNA and Alternative Mechanisms

“…Thus, the important role of the PI3K/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and NF-κB pathways is emphasized, as in OvCa they are often hyperactive and susceptible to mutations, which correlates with a poor prognosis [ 36 ]. Bioinformatics methods have revealed five key regulators in OvCa: AKT1 , KRAS , EPCAM , CD44 , and MCAM ; AKT1 , as one might expect, plays the most important role [ 37 ]. A separate significant point is the ratio of AKT pathways and autophagy.…”

ACE2 Homo-dimerization, Human Genomic variants and Interaction of Host Proteins Explain High Population Specific Differences in Outcomes of COVID19

“…Removal of high degree nodes (hubs) in biological networks may cause lethality in various complex biological networks. This idea of understanding may enable us to determine the topological features of the network architecture, important functionally related modules and hubs [55,56]. The topological properties were calculated after each subsequent removal using the Network Analyzer plugin in Cytoscape version 3.7.1.…”

Troxerutin acts on complement mediated inflammation to ameliorate arthritic symptoms in rats

“…The PPI study of the identified protein sets and the protein community finding by in silico network analysis identified a set of key regulator molecules [42][43][44][45] Upon TXR treatment, the C9, AAG and catalase abundance were decreased almost to the basal levels without significant alteration in CRP, a non-specific indicator of inflammation. High aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity has been reported in osteoarthritis patients'…”