Proceedings of the 1976 ACM SIGFIDET (Now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control - FIDET '76 1976
DOI: 10.1145/800296.811509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for transferring programs and data

Abstract: The paper presents an overview of current and proposed solutions to the problems of incompatible programs and data between dissimilar computer systems. The approaches are formalized, compared, and contrasted. Standardization, program translation, data translation, and system translation are discussed. Different approaches to data translation are compared with respect to the class of translation being performed and with respect to the operation of the translation software.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another four level model, similar in concept to the one we suggest here, was suggested by Sibley [SIB74]. Research has been done on the formalization of these levels and the transforma tion between them, directed mainly toward data transla tion [YAM74] or data base simulation [SCH74]. Though we could have developed most of our notions in the framework of one of these models, we prefer to develop our own terminology and structure for two major reasons.…”
Section: Sibley and Taylor [Sib73]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another four level model, similar in concept to the one we suggest here, was suggested by Sibley [SIB74]. Research has been done on the formalization of these levels and the transforma tion between them, directed mainly toward data transla tion [YAM74] or data base simulation [SCH74]. Though we could have developed most of our notions in the framework of one of these models, we prefer to develop our own terminology and structure for two major reasons.…”
Section: Sibley and Taylor [Sib73]mentioning
confidence: 99%