2010
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for the development of a taxonomy and toolkit to evaluate health-related habits and lifestyle (eVITAL)

Abstract: BackgroundChronic diseases cause an ever-increasing percentage of morbidity and mortality, but many have modifiable risk factors. Many behaviors that predispose or protect an individual to chronic disease are interrelated, and therefore are best approached using an integrated model of health and the longevity paradigm, using years lived without disability as the endpoint.FindingsThis study used a 4-phase mixed qualitative design to create a taxonomy and related online toolkit for the evaluation of health-relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome of the development of the lifestyle assessment toolkit consisted in a user-friendly 8 dimension-based questionnaire instrumentalized with technology for e-health extraction data, a powerful tool for citizen engagement toward e-health approaches. Our toolkit development process is comparable with other development processes, including those involved in the eVITAL toolkit (17, 18) or the support to decision making and management toolkit e-HIT (49), among others. The benefits of incorporating non-intrusive, user-friendly technologies for data extraction and reporting encompasses among others psychological empathy/attraction by the users and identification of innovative technologies to support innovation and business targeting the citizens in socio-economic local ecosystems (50, 51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The outcome of the development of the lifestyle assessment toolkit consisted in a user-friendly 8 dimension-based questionnaire instrumentalized with technology for e-health extraction data, a powerful tool for citizen engagement toward e-health approaches. Our toolkit development process is comparable with other development processes, including those involved in the eVITAL toolkit (17, 18) or the support to decision making and management toolkit e-HIT (49), among others. The benefits of incorporating non-intrusive, user-friendly technologies for data extraction and reporting encompasses among others psychological empathy/attraction by the users and identification of innovative technologies to support innovation and business targeting the citizens in socio-economic local ecosystems (50, 51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with the development of health literacy and technologies applied to health and well-being, HeaLIQs4Cities main task was to develop a toolkit for a rapid and informal assessment of healthy lifestyles, to be further incorporated into different levels of health care. Previous reports suggest that this type of tools could be useful to evaluate health-related habits and lifestyle and complement current approaches with new models of care (17, 18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All members are encouraged to participate in the discussion following a sequential order and every round is followed by a final debate [ 14 , 15 ]. In the health sector nominal groups have been previously used to develop the preliminary taxonomy of health related habits and lifestyle [ 16 ] and its integration into primary care [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 PID domains assessment may involve a combination of procedures aimed at assessing healthy and unhealthy lifestyle factors and related health contributors. 80,81 The PID model's second defining pillar, Pluralistic Descriptive Procedures, opens up the opportunity to employ categories, dimensions, and narratives for greater flexibility and effectiveness for the evaluation task at hand. 46,76 Categorization would not be of the classical form (abstract and deterministic) but of a probabilistic or prototypic form (attributes not being jointly necessary and sufficient, but only correlated with the corresponding category), 82 as is being used progressively in diagnostic systems.…”
Section: Contributorsmentioning
confidence: 99%