2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12239-013-0090-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for the accuracy improvement of FEM beam type T-junctions of buses and coaches structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be noticed that the FE beam element using flexible joint beam element has the lowest error for those other. This was clearly identified that FE beam flexible joint or compensated joint modeling approach could have an equivalent solution to other element that agreed with the study of E. Alcala et al [9] (a) Figure 8 displayed the maximum stress distribution occurred on the bus superstructure in a case of torsion load, which was the critical condition. The critical stress of 81.94 MPa occurred on the cross beam member of body structure which was adjacent to rear wheel hub.…”
Section: Strength Analysis Of Bus Superstructure By Improved Flexiblesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It could be noticed that the FE beam element using flexible joint beam element has the lowest error for those other. This was clearly identified that FE beam flexible joint or compensated joint modeling approach could have an equivalent solution to other element that agreed with the study of E. Alcala et al [9] (a) Figure 8 displayed the maximum stress distribution occurred on the bus superstructure in a case of torsion load, which was the critical condition. The critical stress of 81.94 MPa occurred on the cross beam member of body structure which was adjacent to rear wheel hub.…”
Section: Strength Analysis Of Bus Superstructure By Improved Flexiblesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the infinite rigid behavior of beam joint modeling continues to be a limitation in the analysis. This imperfection decides an inflexible behavior of structures interpreting into an error cause for the structural analysis (up to 45%) [9]. In previous studies, the reliability of bus structure was proposed using shell and volume element type analysis [2,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, model was more easily adjusted and modified compared to the surface. In case of the accuracy, it was presented that results of the surface element were closely the fact [8]. After having literature review, the number of researches related to strength stiffness and stability of truck structure was found that there was maximum stress especially when braking and cornering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In their study [18] developed an alternative beam T-junction model that allowed them to obtain more precise deformation results when utilizing beam type elements, also allowing them to take into consideration different T-junction configurations. Their focus was to improve the results provided by beam type elements when simulating structures that by their characteristics cannot be realistically simulated with anything but beam type elements due to the complexity of the modeling process, the computational requirements or other practical aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%