2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for quantitative landslide risk analysis in residential projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Slope and elevation directly determine the stress distribution of a highway slope, larger slope and elevation will lead to higher potential energy, so that weak structural plane will be exposed easily and the highway slope will suffer from instability [13,35].…”
Section: Impact Factors Of Hldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. Slope and elevation directly determine the stress distribution of a highway slope, larger slope and elevation will lead to higher potential energy, so that weak structural plane will be exposed easily and the highway slope will suffer from instability [13,35].…”
Section: Impact Factors Of Hldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches on landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in China mainly focused on the Wenchuan, Yushu and Ya'an earthquake areas, the Three Gorges Reservoir areas, the areas affected by typhoons and loess areas; researches abroad China mainly focused on the Medellin areas (Columbia), Kyushu areas (Japan) and some areas in Italy [13][14][15]. The modeling methods implemented to LSM mainly included the statistical prediction models, i.e., Logistic regression method (LR), decision tree method, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), deterministic coefficient method and multivariate adaptive regression spline model (MARSplines), and the machine learning models, i.e., artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), neuro-fuzzy technique, decision tree model and Bayesian network (BN), some scholars also conducted comparison researches on multiple modeling methods [11,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un peligro (evento) combinado con una probabilidad determinan la amenaza P [T], la cual combinada con las consecuencias expresan el riesgo (R) [17]. La vulnerabilidad está representada en las consecuencias, como el valor de la pérdida u(C) debido a la ocurrencia de un evento catastrófico [18]:…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified
“…One of the most effective measures for risk prevention and mitigation is the evaluation of both the hazard of the phenomenon and of the exposure and vulnerability of the elements at risk [17]. In Colombia, some studies have been carried out that evaluate risk assessment and reduction [7,[18][19][20], but there are many more that evaluate hazard or susceptibility. For hazard, there are numerous deterministic and probabilistic methods, the latter of which are generally the most applied for extensive areas due to the lack of precise and exhaustive data in such areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%