2017
DOI: 10.1080/08957959.2017.1306626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for in situ synchrotron X-ray studies in the laser-heated diamond anvil cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffraction patterns were collected on a MarCCD camera, with collection times of 30–60 s. Samples were heated on both sides by two continuous Nd:YAG fiber lasers (TEM00), each one delivering up to 200 W. Hot spots were approximately 20 μm in diameter, much larger than the full width at half maximum of the focused X‐ray beam. All temperatures were measured by the spectroradiometric method, using a Planck fit of the observed blackbody radiation from the center of the heating spot, as described by Mezouar et al (). While absolute errors in temperature are on the order of 150 K, the measured temperature was seen to vary by less than 30 K during pattern integration (averaged over three to five measurements per diffraction pattern).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffraction patterns were collected on a MarCCD camera, with collection times of 30–60 s. Samples were heated on both sides by two continuous Nd:YAG fiber lasers (TEM00), each one delivering up to 200 W. Hot spots were approximately 20 μm in diameter, much larger than the full width at half maximum of the focused X‐ray beam. All temperatures were measured by the spectroradiometric method, using a Planck fit of the observed blackbody radiation from the center of the heating spot, as described by Mezouar et al (). While absolute errors in temperature are on the order of 150 K, the measured temperature was seen to vary by less than 30 K during pattern integration (averaged over three to five measurements per diffraction pattern).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…about ± 5 GPa at megabar conditions. The temperature was measured basing on the sample thermal emission (black body radiation) collected using Schwarzschild mirrors 43 . Considering various sources of error, including both radial and axial temperature gradients in the laser-heated sample, pressure evolution of the sample emissivity and temperature fluctuations with time, the total uncertainty of the temperature determined using the Planck radiation function can be estimated to be around ± 150 K for the experimental setup employed in this study 44 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic errors in the temperature measurement using refractive or reflective lenses, respectively used by Aquilanti et al (2015) and Anzellini et al (2013), have been recently investigated , pointing out that such a large discrepancy (900 K at 100 GPa) cannot be ascribed to the use of different optics. The effect of chemical reactions with the pressure medium and/or diamonds has been discussed for tantalum (Dewaele et al, 2010;Mezouar et al, 2017) and is still under investigation for the case of iron. Nickel is much less reactive than iron thus reducing the possible occurrence of chemical reactions (Lord, Wood, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Review Of Experimental Techniques For the Determination Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible reasons for this discrepancy are systematic errors in the temperature detection, sample modifications such as reactions, or misinterpretation of the solid‐liquid transition signature. Systematic errors in the temperature measurement using refractive or reflective lenses, respectively used by Aquilanti et al () and Anzellini et al (), have been recently investigated (Mezouar et al, ), pointing out that such a large discrepancy (900 K at 100 GPa) cannot be ascribed to the use of different optics. The effect of chemical reactions with the pressure medium and/or diamonds has been discussed for tantalum (Dewaele et al, ; Mezouar et al, ) and is still under investigation for the case of iron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%