2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for accident analyses of fusion breeder blankets and its application to helium-cooled pebble bed blanket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It addresses both the different sources of uncertainties-computer code models, system model representations, plant operating parameters and effect of scale as well as the specificity of the BB designs, materials, and phenomena. The applicability and robustness was demonstrated by the qualification of the models by comparison with finite element analyses and code-to-code comparisons and executed thus for sensitivity studies in HCLL [8] and HCPB [9] ITER test blanket systems (TBSs) specific accident scenarios: 32 h LOOP, LOFA and LOFA with aggravating failure of in-box LOCA. The reported advantages of the proposed method are its flexibility, practicality and progressive direct improved understanding.…”
Section: Highlights Of Presentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It addresses both the different sources of uncertainties-computer code models, system model representations, plant operating parameters and effect of scale as well as the specificity of the BB designs, materials, and phenomena. The applicability and robustness was demonstrated by the qualification of the models by comparison with finite element analyses and code-to-code comparisons and executed thus for sensitivity studies in HCLL [8] and HCPB [9] ITER test blanket systems (TBSs) specific accident scenarios: 32 h LOOP, LOFA and LOFA with aggravating failure of in-box LOCA. The reported advantages of the proposed method are its flexibility, practicality and progressive direct improved understanding.…”
Section: Highlights Of Presentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was mentioned that management/preservation of experimental data is crucial for computer codes and safety methods development (knowledge management, reference case, licensing, and so forth). A powerful tool called phenomena identification and ranking tables (PIRTs) was introduced, the effective use of which has been demonstrated at F4E for Fusion Breeder Blankets Accident Analysis [5]. Suggestions for further work and challenges to be met on fusion safety were made particularly to facilitate international cooperation, for example meetings, seminars, and projects on specific subjects, establishing and maintaining a stronger and wider fusion safety community, broader technical exchanges with the fission safety community and industrial engagement.…”
Section: Highlights Of Presentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudimentary MHD correlations are implemented in RELAP5-3D [12] and MARS-FR [13] but are limited to straight rectangular/circular ducts and, thus, do not support any treatment for junctions, manifolds, etc. Basic MHD modelling capabilities have been implemented in MELCOR 1.8.5 and 1.8.6, which have been modified for the study of fusion-relevant systems [14][15][16]. Moreover, pursuing the quest for the realization of a MHD system-level tool, a novel code called MHD-SYS has been developed that features models for the simulation of multiple electrical-coupled ducts and heat transfer for basic layouts, whereas coupling with CFD codes is employed to supply the system code with reliable input data for the behaviour of the flow in complex geometrical elements [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%