2010
DOI: 10.1080/01615440903443359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologies for Reconstructing a Pastoral Landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, because ranch boundaries did not adhere to their legally prescribed shape and size, each ranch possessed a unique shape and size that generally exceeded the prescribed square of 776 ha (Hunter, 2010). Again, the greater area of pasture could increase the area of overlap between pasture and agricultural land used to estimate the LULCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, because ranch boundaries did not adhere to their legally prescribed shape and size, each ranch possessed a unique shape and size that generally exceeded the prescribed square of 776 ha (Hunter, 2010). Again, the greater area of pasture could increase the area of overlap between pasture and agricultural land used to estimate the LULCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonial land-grant register is now preserved in the Archivo General de la Nación in Mexico City (Sluyter, 2002). The associated site descriptions allow many land grants to be relocated and mapped using GIS (Hunter, 2010). These maps then facilitate area calculations of LULCCs over time and space for an entire century.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 Different methodologies are a key reason for these discrepant conclusions. 4 A more personal reason is that we tend to write causal sequences of past environmental change in such a way that they yield meaningful stories. 5 This implicates the narrative form of scholarly writing, our initial motives for conducting the study, subconscious biases in data collection and interpretation, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%