Méthodologie des tests de provocation orale standardisés à double insu pour le diagnostic de l'allergie alimentaire. Revue de la littérature et expérience du service de médecine interne, immunologie clinique et allergologie de Nancy

Moneret‐Vautrin, D.A.; Kanny, G.; Beaudouin, É.; Morisset, M.

doi:10.1016/s0335-7457(00)80012-x

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Oral challenges were carried out according to the procedure including placebo, food and single‐or double‐blind tests [12, 15, 16], with the informed consent of the patients or of their parents. Stewed apples or mashed potatoes are commonly chosen as placebo since they are not allergenic (rare cases excepted, but not encountered in this series).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thresholds of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut and sesame in immunoglobulin E‐dependent allergies: evaluation by double‐blind or single‐blind placebo‐controlled oral challenges

Morisset

Moneret-Vautrin

Kanny

et al. 2003

Clin Experimental Allergy

Self Cite

170

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The risk of asthma and anaphylactic shock to sesame and peanut is confirmed. Minimal reactive quantities show that, in order to guarantee a 95% safety for patients who are allergic to egg, peanut and milk, and on the basis of consumption of 100 g of food, the detection tests should ensure a sensitivity of 10 p.p.m. for egg, 24 p.p.m. for peanut and 30 p.p.m. for milk proteins. Oil allergies being considered, the limit of sensitivity should fall to 5 p.p.m.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%