“…More recently, advances in eDNA metabarcoding have enabled broad application of this method in biodiversity monitoring (for reviews see, e.g., Bohmann et al., 2014; Cristescu & Hebert, 2018), and the application to fecal samples provides a valuable alternative approach for dietary reconstruction. This value is evidenced both by direct comparison of different approaches (e.g., Newmaster et al., 2013) and by the rapidly increasing number of studies using this method (for recent reviews see, e.g., Ando et al., 2020; de Sousa, Silva, & Xavier et al., 2019). So far, fecal DNA metabarcoding has been successfully applied to reconstruct the diets of a range of different herbivores, including birds, insects, molluscs (e.g., Valentini et al., 2009) and a wide range of mammalian herbivores such as small rodents (e.g., Lopes et al., 2015; Sato et al., 2018; Soininen et al., 2014, 2015), a number of deer species (e.g., Bison et al., 2015; Czernik et al., 2013; Fløjgaard, De Barba, Taberlet, & Ejrnæs, 2017; Rayé et al., 2011), tapirs (e.g., Hibert et al., 2013), several primate species (e.g., Bradley et al., 2007), the European bison (e.g., Kowalczyk et al., 2011, 2019), and large herbivore assemblages in Kenya (Kartzinel et al., 2015; Kartzinel & Pringle, 2020) and Mozambique (Pansu et al., 2019).…”