2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89674-6_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Steps and Issues When Deriving Individual Based-Models from Equation-Based Models: A Case Study in Population Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to overcome the limitation is to use a graphrepresentation as an intermediate level which allows more flexible information transfer from different levels of a complex system either as bottom-up or top-down information flow through levels. This idea was introduced in Nguyen [30] and in some related and extended work [31][32][33]. This methodology was first tested with the theoretical case study in population systems/ecology; and later rapidly applied to fishery systems, epidemiology systems [34], soil systems [35], and waste management systems [36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to overcome the limitation is to use a graphrepresentation as an intermediate level which allows more flexible information transfer from different levels of a complex system either as bottom-up or top-down information flow through levels. This idea was introduced in Nguyen [30] and in some related and extended work [31][32][33]. This methodology was first tested with the theoretical case study in population systems/ecology; and later rapidly applied to fishery systems, epidemiology systems [34], soil systems [35], and waste management systems [36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need, then, to provide a form of translation (Moreira et al, 2009 calls it a "coupler") that takes into account the peculiarities of each model, often linked to the formalism in which it is described (e.g., agent-based modeling, discrete event, continuous equations). Numerous works have therefore addressed the problem of combining or coupling models described using different paradigms, like for example Rochette et al (2012) on the coupling of hydrodynamic continuous models and individual-based models, Quesnel (2005) on the coupling of physical and social models, Rousseaux et al (2012) on the coupling of continuous and discrete formalisms in ecological modeling or Nguyen et al (2008) on the coupling between agent-based models and equation-based models through the use of intermediate graph-based representations.…”
Section: Models Coupling In Socio-environmental Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these two models has its own strengths and weakness ( [6], [12]) depending on the purpose of study. EBMs, on one hand, play as compartment models and operate on global laws generally, defined by the equations that apply to all members of the compartments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the process can be completely top-down: by distributing global parameters of a given EBM to obtain local parameters of a related ABM. We refer to our previous contribution [12] for this way. It can also be bottom-up, by extracting local parameters of a given ABM to obtain global parameters of inferred EBM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%