2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00535.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological quality of front-of-pack labeling studies: a review plus identification of research challenges

Abstract: This review evaluates the methodological quality of current front-of-pack labeling research and discusses future research challenges. Peer-reviewed articles were identified using a computerized search of the databases PubMed and Web of Science (ISI) from 1990 to February 2011; reference lists from key published articles were used as well. The quality of the 31 included studies was assessed. The results showed that the methodological quality of published front-of-pack labeling research is generally low to medio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used this time frame to allow a sufficient gap in time for consumers to become familiar with the new labels and researchers to examine consumers’ familiarity with labels, which is important factor for label use (Bialkova & van Trijp, 2010). Similarly, we omit studies investigating relatively new forms of nutrition information, namely, front-of-package symbols, which appear on some products (Hawley et al, 2013; Hersey, Wohlgenant, Arsenault, Kosa, & Muth, 2013; Vyth et al, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used this time frame to allow a sufficient gap in time for consumers to become familiar with the new labels and researchers to examine consumers’ familiarity with labels, which is important factor for label use (Bialkova & van Trijp, 2010). Similarly, we omit studies investigating relatively new forms of nutrition information, namely, front-of-package symbols, which appear on some products (Hawley et al, 2013; Hersey, Wohlgenant, Arsenault, Kosa, & Muth, 2013; Vyth et al, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review that focused on methodological quality of simplified nutrition information research underlined the importance of objectively measuring the impact of interpretational aids on behavior change of consumers rather than only measuring improvements in understanding of nutrition information [14]. Results of the review show that studies that objectively measure longitudinal behavioral change in a realistic setting against a control measure, such as collecting sales data before and after introduction of nutrition information, were of the highest quality and relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although these methods are more effective at improving consumer understanding of food nutrient content than NFP [13], studies that actually measure their impact on behavior in realistic settings are limited and inconsistent [12,14]. Implementation of a traffic light system that color coded content of 4 nutrients (total fat, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar) in United Kingdom grocery stores showed no effect on consumer purchases [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These methodological issues severely limit the possibility to extend these results to population level. A recent work from Vyth and colleagues [31] highlighted the urgent need in nutrition science of longitudinal, randomized, controlled design in a real-life setting.…”
Section: The Contribution Of Confectionerymentioning
confidence: 99%