2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing

Abstract: Against the background of recent methodological debates pitting ethnography against interviewing, this paper offers a defense of the latter and argues for methodological pluralism and pragmatism and against methodological tribalism. Drawing on our own work and on other sources, we discuss some of the strengths and weaknesses of interviewing. We argue that concern over whether attitudes correspond to behavior is an overly narrow and misguided question. Instead we offer that we should instead consider what inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
251
1
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
251
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken collectively, the oral history interviews offered the optimal data for cultural analysis, as it allows for the interpretation of how this generation of African Americans "collectively engage in meaning-making processes" that "structure people's ability to think and to share ideals" (Lamont & Swidler, 2014). One measure to enhance the durability of the frame of the collective memories is the large sample size.…”
Section: Oral History Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken collectively, the oral history interviews offered the optimal data for cultural analysis, as it allows for the interpretation of how this generation of African Americans "collectively engage in meaning-making processes" that "structure people's ability to think and to share ideals" (Lamont & Swidler, 2014). One measure to enhance the durability of the frame of the collective memories is the large sample size.…”
Section: Oral History Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prominent researchers have responded to this challenge. Lamont and Swidler (2014) caution against "methodological tribalism," defending interview methodology as appropriate (and often ideal) for addressing questions of social boundaries, status hierarchies, and other phenomena. Similarly, Pugh (2013) maintains that critiques of interview methods are largely founded on flawed understandings.…”
Section: Martin's Critique and The Interview Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on multiple disciplines and methods means acknowledging that different disciplines and techniques have specific advantages and limitations (depth versus breadth, singularity versus generalizability, etc.) and that the selection and combination of disciplines and methods should be determined by the questions and problems being addressed (Lamont and Swidler 2014). Accordingly, given the questions of the project, I employed comparative-historical methods mainly to shed light on the sociopolitical conditions that have shaped the historical development of early childhood education policies and practices.…”
Section: Complementarity and Interdisciplinary Integration Of Scientimentioning
confidence: 99%