Handbook of Marriage and the Family 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-5367-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Pluralism and Qualitative Family Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After obtaining informed consent, I used a semistructured interview instrument of 20 standard questions informed by the extant literature and my previous research experience, consistent with the analytic induction approach forwarded by Jane Gilgun (Gilgun, 1999; Gilgun et al, 1992). A qualitative, narrative‐based approach was used in hope of uncovering richer, thicker information about religious practices and family relationships (Josselson & Lieblich, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining informed consent, I used a semistructured interview instrument of 20 standard questions informed by the extant literature and my previous research experience, consistent with the analytic induction approach forwarded by Jane Gilgun (Gilgun, 1999; Gilgun et al, 1992). A qualitative, narrative‐based approach was used in hope of uncovering richer, thicker information about religious practices and family relationships (Josselson & Lieblich, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is that GTM are not being employed to their full advantage. Given how much family studies has relied on qualitative research to generate important theoretical insights (Gilgun, 1999; LaRossa & Wolf, 1985), family researchers can ill afford to ignore a situation that threatens their ability to do theoretical work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a member of the first group submits a manuscript for publication, and members of the second group happen to be the manuscript's reviewers (by which I mean the external readers), the manuscript is likely to be rejected. Such conflicts are not limited to instances in which quantitatively oriented reviewers are evaluating qualitative manuscripts; differences of opinion also exist among qualitatively oriented reviewers (e.g., see Gilgun, 1999; Goodwin & Horowitz, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%