2013
DOI: 10.1080/18128602.2012.686532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological issues in modelling time-of-travel preferences

Abstract: We address three methodological issues that arise when modelling time-of-travel preferences: unequal period lengths, schedule delay in the absence of desired timeof-travel data and the 24-hour cycle. Varying period length is addressed by using size variables. Schedule delay is treated by assuming either arrival or departure time sensitivity and using market segment specific utility functions of time-oftravel, or using distributions of the desired times-of-travel. The 24-hour cycle is modelled by using a trigon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To deal with data Joint estimation of mode and time of day choice accounting for arrival time flexibility, travel time reliability and crowding on public transport Ho and Hensher unavailability, operational trip timing models use a set of constants associated with different time periods to capture traveller's preferences for a particular departure/arrival time. Although this approach may lead to problems with model identification and interpretation (see Ben-Akiva and Abou-Zeid, 2013;Hess et al, 2005 for in-depth discussion) it does not associate with any operational issues for large scale modelling systems.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with data Joint estimation of mode and time of day choice accounting for arrival time flexibility, travel time reliability and crowding on public transport Ho and Hensher unavailability, operational trip timing models use a set of constants associated with different time periods to capture traveller's preferences for a particular departure/arrival time. Although this approach may lead to problems with model identification and interpretation (see Ben-Akiva and Abou-Zeid, 2013;Hess et al, 2005 for in-depth discussion) it does not associate with any operational issues for large scale modelling systems.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes an alternative-specific constant βML. The time-of-day effect is further incorporated in the form of cyclic trigonometric functions, as introduced in research undertaken by Ben-Akiva and Abou-Zeid ( 39 ). …”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound TOD choice models are paramount to travel forecasting models because evaluations of several travel-demand management strategies rely on accurate predictions of the temporal variation in travel volumes. Therefore, several studies proposed appropriate methods to model individuals' travel timing in a tourbased approach (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Besides, recent studies suggest that TOD choice models may have better transferability than other components of ABMs such as mode choice and location choice models (3,4).…”
Section: An Empirical Assessment Of the Transferability Of Tour-based Time-of-day (Tod) Choice Models Across Different Counties In The Samentioning
confidence: 99%