Methodological implications of Marxian praxis in action research

Abstract

When considering Karl Marx's conception of praxis, numerous relations between it and action research come to the surface. These relations are not only important for understanding the roots of action research, but also future directions of the methodology. Marx's short, but important text, the Theses on Feuerbach, not only constructs the foundation for Marxian praxis, but also can be read as an action research text, for it stands as an example of how to transform knowledge generation into a practical and active process. Moreover, praxis functions as a mode of epistemology and a revolutionary system that espouses human agency. One can further draw connections between Marxian praxis and action research in terms of how praxis requires researchers to be critical of dominant ideologies and methodologies. Therefore, revisiting Marxist theory, particularly its specific conception of praxis, is a crucial exercise for action researchers, particularly in a context where problems associated with the capitalist political economy continue to profoundly affect people's lives.

Theory Amid Policy and Practice: A Typology of Theory Use in Educational Leadership Scholarship

“…While scholars at the time may have conducted empirical research with a perception that specific theories had to be aligned to specific methodological approaches, that stance on the relationship between theory and methods is no longer a defining feature (see, for example, Kincheloe & Tobin, 2009; Pallas, 2001). For example, scholars have applied theories such as Marxism and feminism, which frame how power operates in society through socioeconomic status and gender respectively, to inform the development of the research design, analyze data, and interpret findings from both qualitative and quantitative studies (see, for example, Carter Andrews et al, 2019; Cunningham, 2017; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016; Sosa-Provencio, 2019). 1…”

Narrative, Nature-Based Participatory Action Research (PAR) among Female Turkish Migrants in Denmark: Reflections on Methodological Benefits and Challenges

“…For Malinowski, participation was neither a goal nor a way of transforming the lives of the people he studied; it was a means by which to dig out knowledge pertaining to cultures and "the science of Man [3]" as a broader aim. More than half a century later, many ethnographic researchers and anthropologists, as well as action-researchers, have, with inspiration from Marxist ideology, applied a motivation with which to work toward transformation through and via 'the native's point of view', in solidarity with and for the benefit of the 'natives' or for 'the people' [4]. However, a wave of reflexivity then questioned the role of scholars in the realm of ethnographic interaction and their impact as participants in the field [5].…”

Breaking the ice: educator leaders' entré into equity and inclusion leadership in a rural high school

“…Consequently, action research for social change commonly uses Marxist ontological assumptions. Namely, the reality is dependent on social influences and the contextual interpretation thereof, which is contingent on an individual's critical consciousness (Coghlan, 2011;Cunningham, 2017).…”