2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological considerations in treatment evaluations of tinnitus distress: A call for guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since tinnitus is a purely subjective disorder, the evaluation of treatment interventions is challenging. 1,2 Hence, we agree with the abovementioned methodological limitations of our pilot study. In the evaluation of a non-pharmacologic intervention like qigong, one has to deal with further methodological difficulties, such as the adequacy of the control group or randomisation of a motivated patient to the control group.…”
Section: Marc Département De Pédiatrie Université Laval Québec supporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since tinnitus is a purely subjective disorder, the evaluation of treatment interventions is challenging. 1,2 Hence, we agree with the abovementioned methodological limitations of our pilot study. In the evaluation of a non-pharmacologic intervention like qigong, one has to deal with further methodological difficulties, such as the adequacy of the control group or randomisation of a motivated patient to the control group.…”
Section: Marc Département De Pédiatrie Université Laval Québec supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Tinnitus is a prevalent disorder that is difficult to treat, and as such is in urgent need of more efficient treatment options. Since tinnitus is a purely subjective disorder, the evaluation of treatment interventions is challenging 1,2 . Hence, we agree with the above‐mentioned methodological limitations of our pilot study.…”
Section: Authors' Replysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many of the clinical trials in tinnitus have critical methodological limitations including: inappropriate outcome measures and statistical methods, insufficient sample sizes, poorly defined interventions, problems with study blinding and randomization and insufficient reporting of study details [33-35]. The heterogeneous quality of tinnitus treatment studies is echoed by all Cochrane Reviews regarding tinnitus treatment studies [20, 23, 36-39] and has led to efforts to describe basic methodological recommendations for the designs of clinical tinnitus trials [40].…”
Section: The Methodologic Quality Of Clinical Trials Is Variablementioning
confidence: 99%