Methodological Considerations for Comparison of Cross-species Use of Tactile Contact

Abstract

Cross-species comparisons are benefited by compatible datasets; conclusions related to phylogenetic comparisons, questions on convergent and divergent evolution, or homologs versus analogs can only be made when the behaviors being measured are comparable. A direct comparison of the social function of physical contact across two disparate taxa is possible only if data collection and analyses methodologies are analogous. We identify and discuss the parameters, assumptions and measurement schemes applicable to multiple taxa and species that facilitate cross-species comparisons. To illustrate our proposed guidelines for evaluating the role played by tactile contact in social behavior across disparate taxa, this paper presents data on mother-offspring relationships in the two species studied by the authors: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) and dolphins (bottlenose and spotted, Tursiops truncatus and Stenella frontalis, respectively). Cross-species comparative studies allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the similarities and differences with respect to how animals traverse the relationships that form their social groups and societies.

Testing individual variations of horses’ tactile reactivity: when, where, how?

“…Early deprivation of physical contact (rhesus monkey: Suomi et al 1973;rats: Davis et al 2017) leads to impaired social and cognitive development and can be detrimental to survival as well as reproduction. Its role can vary from transferring information, developing and maintaining relationships, or alleviating an uncomfortable state (Dudzinski et al 2019).…”